Literature DB >> 12419663

Evolving the division of labour: generalists, specialists and task allocation.

L M Wahl1.   

Abstract

The evolutionary dynamics of specialization, in the context of the division of labour, are investigated. Individuals associate in groups in which benefits are shared and costs borne individually; each individual is either a generalist who can perform all the necessary tasks, a specialist who performs a sub-set of the necessary tasks, or a parasite who contributes nothing to the group. The implications of the model are explored analytically and through both numerical and Monte Carlo methods. These methods demonstrate the evolution of populations towards stable arrangements of specialists and generalists. The fittest populations are those that divide tasks fairly and associate in large, highly specialized groups. Generalists have a distinct advantage in small groups, but the presence of generalists, ironically, lowers group fitness. Parasites are able to invade both specialized and non-specialized populations. A basic model for the continuous division of labour is also presented, demonstrating a tendency for populations to evolve increasingly unfair divisions of labour. This last result implies that an evolutionary ratchet favours disparity between the workload of specialist populations.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12419663     DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.2002.3133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  21 in total

1.  Evolution of self-organized division of labor in a response threshold model.

Authors:  Ana Duarte; Ido Pen; Laurent Keller; Franz J Weissing
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  An evolutionary scenario for the transition to undifferentiated multicellularity.

Authors:  Thomas Pfeiffer; Sebastian Bonhoeffer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-01-23       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Evolution of functional specialization and division of labor.

Authors:  Claus Rueffler; Joachim Hermisson; Günter P Wagner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Fitness and stability of obligate cross-feeding interactions that emerge upon gene loss in bacteria.

Authors:  Samay Pande; Holger Merker; Katrin Bohl; Michael Reichelt; Stefan Schuster; Luís F de Figueiredo; Christoph Kaleta; Christian Kost
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 10.302

5.  A common heritable factor influences prosocial obligations across multiple domains.

Authors:  Gary J Lewis; Timothy C Bates
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  The Red Queen and King in finite populations.

Authors:  Carl Veller; Laura K Hayward; Christian Hilbe; Martin A Nowak
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Spatial interactions and cooperation can change the speed of evolution of complex phenotypes.

Authors:  Natalia L Komarova
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Cellular decision making and biological noise: from microbes to mammals.

Authors:  Gábor Balázsi; Alexander van Oudenaarden; James J Collins
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Rapid transition towards the Division of Labor via evolution of developmental plasticity.

Authors:  Sergey Gavrilets
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 10.  Task syndromes: linking personality and task allocation in social animal groups.

Authors:  J C Loftus; A A Perez; A Sih
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 2.671

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.