Literature DB >> 12418014

Osseointegration on metallic implant surfaces: effects of microgeometry and growth factor treatment.

Sally R Frenkel1, Jordan Simon, Harold Alexander, Michael Dennis, John L Ricci.   

Abstract

Orthopedic implants often loosen due to the invasion of fibrous tissue. The aim of this study was to devise a novel implant surface that would speed healing adjacent to the surface, and create a stable interface for bone integration, by using a chemoattractant for bone precursor cells, and by controlling tissue migration at implant surfaces via specific surface microgeometry design. Experimental surfaces were tested in a canine implantable chamber that simulates the intramedullary bone response around total joint implants. Titanium and alloy surfaces were prepared with specific microgeometries, designed to optimize tissue attachment and control fibrous encapsulation. TGF beta, a mitogen and chemoattractant (Hunziker EB, Rosenberg LC. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996;78:721-733) for osteoprogenitor cells, was used to recruit progenitor cells to the implant surface and to enhance their proliferation. Calcium sulfate hemihydrate (CS) was the delivery vehicle for TGF beta; CS resorbs rapidly and appears to be osteoconductive. Animals were sacrificed at 6 and 12 weeks postoperatively. Results indicated that TGFbeta can be reliably released in an active form from a calcium sulfate carrier in vivo. The growth factor had a significant effect on bone ingrowth into implant channels at an early time period, although this effect was not seen with higher doses at later periods. Adjustment of dosage should render TGF beta more potent at later time periods. Calcium sulfate treatment without TGF beta resulted in a significant increase in bone ingrowth throughout the 12-week time period studied. Bone response to the microgrooved surfaces was dramatic, causing greater ingrowth in 9 of the 12 experimental conditions. Microgrooves also enhanced the mechanical strength of CS-coated specimens. The grooved surface was able to control the direction of ingrowth. This surface treatment may result in a clinically valuable implant design to induce rapid ingrowth and a strong bone-implant interface, contributing to implant longevity. Copyright 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12418014     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.10408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res        ISSN: 0021-9304


  13 in total

1.  In vitro behavior of layer-by-layer deposited molecular oligoelectrolyte films on Ti-6Al-4V surfaces.

Authors:  Sabine Ponader; Karin Rosenlehner; Eleftherios Vairaktaris; Cornelius von Wilmowsky; Karl A Schlegel; Friedrich W Neukam; Cordula D Schmidt; Torsten Schunk; Andreas Hirsch; Emeka Nkenke
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  The effect of Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation on titanium discs with microtextured surface morphology.

Authors:  Esra Ercan; Celal Candirli; Tuna Arin; Levent Kara; Cihan Uysal
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 3.  Nanotechnology approaches to improve dental implants.

Authors:  Antoni P Tomisa; Maximilien E Launey; Janice S Lee; Mahesh H Mankani; Ulrike G K Wegst; Eduardo Saiz
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 4.  Where is dentistry in regenerative medicine?

Authors:  John L Ricci; Louis Terracio
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.607

5.  Reliability evaluation of alumina-blasted/acid-etched versus laser-sintered dental implants.

Authors:  Erika O Almeida; Amilcar C Freitas Júnior; Estevam A Bonfante; Nelson R F A Silva; Paulo G Coelho
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 3.161

6.  Cross-sectional evaluation of clinical and immunological parameters at partially microgrooved vs machined abutments in humans.

Authors:  Gerhard Iglhaut; Sebastian Salomon; Tobias Fretwurst; Peter Thomas; Janina Endres; Selina Kessler; Burkhard Summer
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-05-25

7.  Strontium ranelate improves the interaction of osteoblastic cells with titanium substrates: Increase in cell proliferation, differentiation and matrix mineralization.

Authors:  William Querido; Marcos Farina; Karine Anselme
Journal:  Biomatter       Date:  2015

8.  Marginal bone loss around non-submerged implants is associated with salivary microbiome during bone healing.

Authors:  Xiao-Bo Duan; Ting-Xi Wu; Yu-Chen Guo; Xue-Dong Zhou; Yi-Ling Lei; Xin Xu; An-Chun Mo; Yong-Yue Wang; Quan Yuan
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 6.344

9.  Strontium‑containing α‑calcium sulfate hemihydrate promotes bone repair via the TGF‑β/Smad signaling pathway.

Authors:  Zhi Liu; Zewei Yu; Hong Chang; Yu Wang; Haibo Xiang; Xianrong Zhang; Bin Yu
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 2.952

10.  A brief historical perspective on dental implants, their surface coatings and treatments.

Authors:  Celeste M Abraham
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2014-05-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.