Literature DB >> 12414421

Correlation of visual field progression between eyes in patients with open-angle glaucoma.

Philip P Chen1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the correlation of visual field progression between eyes in patients with chronic forms of open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and to determine risk factors for progression.
DESIGN: Retrospective observational case series. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred fifty-two patients seen between April and November 2000 undergoing bilateral treatment for at least 2 years for OAG and who were followed with standard automated perimetry at the University of Washington Medical Center Eye Clinic.
METHODS: Visual field progression was defined using criteria modified from Anderson and Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS) scoring. Progression from a normal to an abnormal visual field required abnormality of two of three criteria (glaucoma hemifield test, corrected pattern standard deviation, and total deviation plot abnormality) on at least two consecutive fields. For abnormal visual fields, criteria for progression were modified from Anderson and were based on worsening observed at three adjacent points on the total deviation plot on at least two consecutive fields. Another definition of progression was a change in AGIS score of four or more points. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual field progression.
RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 7.5 +/- 3.6 years. Fifty-four patients (35.5%) showed progression of the more severely affected of the two eyes (worse eye), and 37 patients (24.3%) had progression in the less affected fellow (better) eye. Among these patients, 24 (15.8%) had bilateral progression (44% and 65% of worse and better eyes with progression, respectively). The between-eye correlation for progression was statistically significant (chi-square with Yates' continuity correction; chi = 16.7, P = 0.00004; R = 0.348, P = 0.00001). The Kaplan-Meier estimates at 10 years for progression in the worse eye, the better eye, and both eyes was 44%, 33%, and 21%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Between-eye correlation of visual field progression in patients with chronic OAG was statistically and clinically significant. Patient-specific factors may play an important role in visual field progression in OAG. Documented progression of visual field loss in one eye may prompt the physician to consider reducing the target intraocular pressure in both eyes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12414421     DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(02)01241-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  11 in total

1.  Comparison of visual field progression between temporally tilted disc and nontilted disc, in patients with normal tension glaucoma.

Authors:  Y J Choy; Y Kwun; J C Han; C Kee
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Normal visual field test results following glaucomatous visual field end points in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study.

Authors:  John L Keltner; Chris A Johnson; Richard A Levine; Juanjuan Fan; Kimberly E Cello; Michael A Kass; Mae O Gordon
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-09

Review 3.  Detection of visual field progression in glaucoma with standard achromatic perimetry: a review and practical implications.

Authors:  Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi; Nariman Nassiri; Annette Giangiacomo; Joseph Caprioli
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Optic disc tilt direction affects regional visual field progression rates in myopic eyes with open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Jong Rak Lee; Jiyun Lee; Jong-Eun Lee; Jin Young Lee; Michael S Kook
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Association of Fellow Eye With Study Eye Disease Trajectories and Need for Fellow Eye Treatment in Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study (CIGTS) Participants.

Authors:  Leslie M Niziol; Brenda W Gillespie; David C Musch
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 7.389

6.  Differences in central corneal thickness between the paired eyes and the severity of the glaucomatous damage.

Authors:  M Iester; S Telani; P Frezzotti; G Manni; M Uva; M Figus; A Perdicchi
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Review of Longitudinal Glaucoma Progression: 5 Years after the Shaffer Lecture.

Authors:  Joel S Schuman; Tigran Kostanyan; Igor Bussel
Journal:  Ophthalmol Glaucoma       Date:  2019-12-02

8.  Prevalence and spatial concordance of visual field deterioration in fellow eyes of glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Min Kyo Kim; Jun Mo Lee; Esteban Morales; Joseph Caprioli
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-11-19

9.  Nasalization of Central Retinal Vessel Trunk Predicts Rapid Progression of Central Visual Field in Open-Angle Glaucoma.

Authors:  Kilhwan Shon; Youn Hye Jo; Joong Won Shin; Junki Kwon; Daun Jeong; Michael S Kook
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Optic disc hemorrhage after phacoemulsification in patients with glaucoma.

Authors:  Karine D Bojikian; Daniel B Moore; Philip P Chen; Mark A Slabaugh
Journal:  ISRN Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.