Literature DB >> 18490866

Chlamydia trachomatis reinfection rates among female adolescents seeking rescreening in school-based health centers.

Charlotte A Gaydos1, Catherine Wright, Billie Jo Wood, Gerry Waterfield, Sharon Hobson, Thomas C Quinn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) infections are common among adolescents attending high and middle schools. The study objective was to determine the reinfection rates of CT for females attending school-based health centers.
METHODS: Adolescents attending school-based health centers who reported they were sexually active were screened for CT using nucleic acid amplification tests on cervical or urine samples. Between 1996 and 2003, 10,609 female students were tested. The overall annual prevalence for unduplicated students in a calendar year ranged from 15.1% to 19.5%. Reinfection was defined as a positive test result occurring between 30 and 365 days after an initial positive result.
RESULTS: There were 897 female students who tested positive for CT and returned for at least 1 subsequent test between 30 and 365 days later. Of these, 236 had 1 or more subsequent positive tests for a cumulative incidence of reinfection in 1 year of 26.3% (95% confidence interval = 23.4-29.2%). Young age at first infection was significantly associated with increased risk of subsequent infection (P <0.01). Across sites, the cumulative incidence of reinfection in these female students ranged from 14.3% to 38.9%.
CONCLUSIONS: The chlamydia cumulative incidence of reinfection in these female adolescents attending high and middle schools was high and supports the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendation to screen adolescents frequently, especially those with a history of a previous chlamydia infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18490866      PMCID: PMC2664683          DOI: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31815c11fe

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Transm Dis        ISSN: 0148-5717            Impact factor:   2.830


  36 in total

1.  Provider willingness to screen all sexually active adolescents for chlamydia.

Authors:  B O Boekeloo; M H Snyder; M Bobbin; G R Burstein; D Conley; T C Quinn; J M Zenilman
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.519

2.  Prevalence and risk factors of asymptomatic chlamydial infection among students in Japan.

Authors:  Hirohisa Imai; Hisae Shinohara; Hiroyuki Nakao; Hiromasa Tsukino; Ryoichi Hamasuna; Takahiko Katoh
Journal:  Int J STD AIDS       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.359

3.  Female prisoners' preferences of collection methods for testing for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection.

Authors:  Sara B Newman; Michael B Nelson; Charlotte A Gaydos; Heidi B Friedman
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.830

4.  Improving participation in Chlamydia screening programs: perspectives of high-risk youth.

Authors:  Diane R Blake; Margaret H Kearney; J Michael Oakes; Susan K Druker; Roger Bibace
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2003-06

5.  Sustained high prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in female army recruits.

Authors:  Charlotte A Gaydos; M René Howell; Thomas C Quinn; Kelly T McKee; Joel C Gaydos
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.830

6.  Screening for sexually transmitted diseases during preparticipation sports examination of high school adolescents.

Authors:  Malanda Nsuami; Migel Elie; Bridget N Brooks; Ladatra S Sanders; Theresa D Nash; Feseha Makonnen; Stephanie N Taylor; Deborah A Cohen
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.012

7.  Self-collected vaginal swabs for the detection of multiple sexually transmitted infections in adolescent girls.

Authors:  C M Holland-Hall; H C Wiesenfeld; P J Murray
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.814

8.  Chlamydia screening of youth and young adults in non-clinical settings throughout California.

Authors:  Heidi M Bauer; Maggie Chartier; Eric Kessell; Laura Packel; Monique Brammeier; Malaika Little; Gail Bolan
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.830

9.  Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infections and specimen collection preference among women, using self-collected vaginal swabs in community settings.

Authors:  Elizabeth Richardson; John W Sellors; Sharon Mackinnon; Vicki Woodcox; Michelle Howard; Dan Jang; Tina Karwalajtys; Max A Chernesky
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.830

10.  Preference among female Army recruits for use of self-administrated vaginal swabs or urine to screen for Chlamydia trachomatis genital infections.

Authors:  Y-H Hsieh; M R Howell; J C Gaydos; K T McKee; T C Quinn; C A Gaydos
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.830

View more
  15 in total

1.  Bridging the gap: using school-based health services to improve chlamydia screening among young women.

Authors:  Rebecca A Braun; Jackie M Provost
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  Electronic Health Record Use in Public Health Infectious Disease Surveillance, USA, 2018-2019.

Authors:  Sarah J Willis; Noelle M Cocoros; Liisa M Randall; Aileen M Ochoa; Gillian Haney; Katherine K Hsu; Alfred DeMaria; Michael Klompas
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 3.725

3.  Nonpathogenic Colonization with Chlamydia in the Gastrointestinal Tract as Oral Vaccination for Inducing Transmucosal Protection.

Authors:  Luying Wang; Cuiming Zhu; Tianyuan Zhang; Qi Tian; Nu Zhang; Sandra Morrison; Richard Morrison; Min Xue; Guangming Zhong
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 4.  Genital Chlamydia trachomatis: understanding the roles of innate and adaptive immunity in vaccine research.

Authors:  Sam Vasilevsky; Gilbert Greub; Denise Nardelli-Haefliger; David Baud
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  Interventions to prevent sexually transmitted infections, including HIV infection.

Authors:  Jeanne M Marrazzo; Willard Cates
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Upsurge of chlamydial reinfection in a large Canadian city: an indication of suboptimal chlamydia screening practices?

Authors:  Mélissa Généeux; Pascale Leclerc; Lucie Bédard; Robert Allard
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct

7.  Randomised controlled trial of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis to prevent pelvic inflammatory disease: the POPI (prevention of pelvic infection) trial.

Authors:  Pippa Oakeshott; Sally Kerry; Adamma Aghaizu; Helen Atherton; Sima Hay; David Taylor-Robinson; Ian Simms; Phillip Hay
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-04-08

8.  Can e-technology through the Internet be used as a new tool to address the Chlamydia trachomatis epidemic by home sampling and vaginal swabs?

Authors:  Charlotte A Gaydos; Mathilda Barnes; Bulbul Aumakhan; Nicole Quinn; Patricia Agreda; Pamela Whittle; Terry Hogan
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.830

9.  Chlamydia trachomatis genotypes and the Swedish new variant among urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis strains in Finland.

Authors:  Suvi Niemi; Eija Hiltunen-Back; Mirja Puolakkainen
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-05-18

Review 10.  Recent advances in understanding and managing Chlamydia trachomatis infections.

Authors:  Jeanne Marrazzo; Robert Suchland
Journal:  F1000Prime Rep       Date:  2014-12-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.