Literature DB >> 10902248

Screening men for Chlamydia trachomatis infection: have we fully explored the possibilities?

K A Fenton1.   

Abstract

Genital chlamydial infection is the commonest curable sexually transmitted disease in England and Wales. It is a major cause of pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy, and infertility. For this reason, research, health promotion, and disease prevention initiatives have focused on women. Screening women for chlamydial infection is concerned mainly with identifying and reducing complications among those already infected (secondary prevention), rather than with preventing new infections (primary prevention). Screening men for genital chlamydial infection, a strategy for preventing new infections in women, has been considered problematic because of the cost, the invasiveness of sampling procedures, and the need to screen in clinical settings. The availability of nucleic acid amplification diagnostic tests challenges these limitations and offers new opportunities for actively including men in disease prevention. This article reviews the arguments for and against screening men for genital chlamydial infection and discusses possible strategies for its implementation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10902248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Commun Dis Public Health        ISSN: 1462-1843


  8 in total

1.  Provider willingness to screen all sexually active adolescents for chlamydia.

Authors:  B O Boekeloo; M H Snyder; M Bobbin; G R Burstein; D Conley; T C Quinn; J M Zenilman
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.519

2.  Influence of material deprivation on hospital admissions for gynaecologic infections.

Authors:  B Olowokure; J I Hawker; S Harcourt; F Warburton; J Weinberg; R C Wilson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2004-06-25       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Chlamydia trachomatis prevalence in men in the mid-west of Ireland.

Authors:  J Powell; C O'Connor; M O'hlarlaithe; J Saunders; J De Freitas
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.519

4.  The chlamydia screening studies: rationale and design.

Authors:  N Low; A McCarthy; J Macleod; C Salisbury; P J Horner; T E Roberts; R Campbell; A Herring; S Skidmore; E Sanford; J A C Sterne; G Davey Smith; A Graham; M Huengsberg; J Ross; M Egger
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.519

5.  Opportunistic and systematic screening for chlamydia: a study of consultations by young adults in general practice.

Authors:  Chris Salisbury; John Macleod; Matthias Egger; Anne McCarthy; Rita Patel; Aisha Holloway; Fowzia Ibrahim; Jonathan A C Sterne; Paddy Horner; Nicola Low
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Knowledge of Chlamydia trachomatis among men and women approached to participate in community-based screening, Scotland, UK.

Authors:  Karen Lorimer; Graham J Hart
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  "Pee-in-a-Pot": acceptability and uptake of on-site chlamydia screening in a student population in the Republic of Ireland.

Authors:  Deirdre Vaughan; Emer O'Connell; Martin Cormican; Ruairi Brugha; Colette Faherty; Myles Balfe; Diarmuid O'Donovan
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 3.090

8.  Young men's views toward the barriers and facilitators of Internet-based Chlamydia trachomatis screening: qualitative study.

Authors:  Karen Lorimer; Lisa McDaid
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 5.428

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.