Literature DB >> 12407036

Tailoring the GnRH antagonist cetrorelix acetate to individual patients' needs in ovarian stimulation for IVF: results of a prospective, randomized study.

M Ludwig1, A Katalinic, C Banz, A K Schröder, M Löning, J M Weiss, K Diedrich.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study was performed to evaluate whether a tailored approach to the administration of the GnRH antagonist cetrorelix acetate according to follicular size leads to a reduction in the amount of Cetrotide vials used and/or an increased number of monitoring visits.
METHODS: Sixty patients were prospectively randomized (using sealed envelopes) to receive either the fixed multiple dose antagonist protocol starting on day 6 of stimulation (group 1), or an individualized protocol with the time of antagonist start according to follicle size (14 mm, group 2), or an individualized single dose protocol (group 3). Recombinant human (rh)FSH was used. The primary endpoints were the number of Cetrotide vials and number of monitoring visits. Statistical power for the parameter Cetrotide vials was 80%.
RESULTS: Patients in group 1 needed significantly more Cetrotide vials (6.81 +/- 1.61) than patients of group 2 (4.59 +/- 1.65; P < 0.01). The number of monitoring visits was similar between the three groups. Surprisingly, the number of retrieved oocytes was significantly higher in the individualized groups as compared with group 1. Despite a significantly lower total amount of rhFSH used, estradiol levels were significantly higher in group 2 as compared with group 1.
CONCLUSION: Tailoring of GnRH antagonist protocols leads to an optimization of ovarian stimulation with more oocytes retrieved despite less rhFSH used, and the same number of monitoring visits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12407036     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/17.11.2842

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  14 in total

Review 1.  Contemporary pharmacological manipulation in assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Judith A F Huirne; Cornelis B Lambalk; Andre C D van Loenen; Roel Schats; Peter G A Hompes; Bart C J M Fauser; Nick S Macklon
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists for assisted reproductive techniques: are there clinical differences between agents?

Authors:  Georg Griesinger; Ricardo E Felberbaum; Askan Schultze-Mosgau; Klaus Diedrich
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Luteal phase oestradiol administration in ovarian stimulation cycles with GnRH antagonist is comparable to the GnRH agonist (long) protocol.

Authors:  J S Cunha Filho; L F Terres; F Holanda; F Freitas; C Glitz; V K Genro; E Arbo
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  GnRH agonist versus GnRH antagonist in in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF/ET).

Authors:  Raffaella Depalo; K Jayakrishan; Gabriella Garruti; Ilaria Totaro; Mariantonietta Panzarino; Francesco Giorgino; Luigi E Selvaggi
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 5.211

5.  Fixed versus Flexible Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Antagonist Protocol in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation for Invitro Fertilization in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.

Authors:  Batool Hossein Rashidi; Tahereh Behrouzi Lak; Ensiyeh ShahrokhTehrani; Fatemeh Davari Tanha
Journal:  J Family Reprod Health       Date:  2015-09

6.  Investigation of pregnancy outcome and ovarian hyper stimulation syndrome prevention in agonist and antagonist gonadotropin-releasing hormone protocol.

Authors:  Behnaz Khani Rabati; Setare Nasiri Zeidi
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.852

Review 7.  Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs: Understanding advantages and limitations.

Authors:  Pratap Kumar; Alok Sharma
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2014-07

8.  Oxidative Stress Markers in GnRH Agonist and Antagonist Protocols in IVF.

Authors:  Lidija Tulić; Snežana Vidaković; Ivan Tulić; Marijana Ćurčić; Jelena Stojnić; Katarina Jeremić
Journal:  J Med Biochem       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 9.  Optimal usage of the GnRH antagonists: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Alan B Copperman; Claudio Benadiva
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 5.211

10.  The Impact of Pituitary Blockage with GnRH Antagonist and Gonadotrophin Stimulation Length on The Outcome of ICSI Cycles in Women Older than 36 Years.

Authors:  Rosane Santana; Amanda Souza Setti; Luiz Guilherme Maldonado; Fernanda Montenegro Valente; Carla Iaconelli; Assumpto Iaconelli; Edson Borges
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-07-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.