Literature DB >> 15018588

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists for assisted reproductive techniques: are there clinical differences between agents?

Georg Griesinger1, Ricardo E Felberbaum, Askan Schultze-Mosgau, Klaus Diedrich.   

Abstract

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists have been tested extensively in ovarian stimulation protocols for assisted reproductive techniques (ART). GnRH antagonists immediately and rapidly inhibit gonadotropin release by the anterior pituitary gland by competitive blockage of the GnRH receptor, preventing and interrupting luteinising hormone surges in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for infertility treatment. A review of the available literature on GnRH antagonists for ART is presented, focusing on the pharmacological and clinical properties of the two compounds available on the market, cetrorelix and ganirelix. Both cetrorelix and ganirelix are well tolerated and effective drugs for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and are of comparable value for infertility treatment. Cetrorelix is available as a 0.25mg preparation for daily injections and as a 3mg intermediate depot preparation. Ganirelix is available as a 0.25mg preparation for daily injections.Currently, two treatment protocols are used in clinical practice: the GnRH antagonist multiple-dose protocol and the GnRH antagonist single-dose protocol. Both protocols are effective and well tolerated. Cetrorelix and ganirelix have not yet been directly compared in a clinical trial; nor have the single-dose and the multiple-dose approaches been compared in a randomised, controlled trial. Data to compare these compounds in clinical terms can be extrapolated only from results of phase II dose-finding studies and phase III studies comparing GnRH agonist cycles with GnRH antagonists in single- and multiple-dose protocols. Therefore, all conclusions on clinical differences between cetrorelix and ganirelix should remain tentative, as they are based on a limited amount of available data.Randomised, controlled trials comparing cetrorelix and ganirelix are warranted to further evaluate benefits and drawbacks of individual GnRH antagonists. Furthermore, more data are needed to determine the efficacy and safety of cetrorelix and ganirelix in established treatment protocols in patients other than those included in clinical trials investigating new drugs, such as "poor responders", patients with polycystic ovaries, patients with a history of allergy or overweight patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15018588     DOI: 10.2165/00003495-200464060-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  60 in total

1.  Comparison of short and long ovulation induction protocols used in ART applications according to the ovarian response and outcome of pregnancy.

Authors:  E Tavmergen; E N Tavmergen Göker; F Sendag; H Sendag; R Levi
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.344

2.  Comparable clinical outcome using the GnRH antagonist ganirelix or a long protocol of the GnRH agonist triptorelin for the prevention of premature LH surges in women undergoing ovarian stimulation.

Authors: 
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Single and multiple dose pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist Cetrorelix in healthy female volunteers.

Authors:  I J Duijkers; C Klipping; W N Willemsen; D Krone; E Schneider; G Niebch; R Hermann
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Ovarian stimulation with HMG: results of a prospective randomized phase III European study comparing the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH)-antagonist cetrorelix and the LHRH-agonist buserelin. European Cetrorelix Study Group.

Authors:  C Albano; R E Felberbaum; J Smitz; H Riethmüller-Winzen; J Engel; K Diedrich; P Devroey
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Structure of the porcine LH- and FSH-releasing hormone. I. The proposed amino acid sequence.

Authors:  H Matsuo; Y Baba; R M Nair; A Arimura; A V Schally
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1971-06-18       Impact factor: 3.575

6.  Luteinizing hormone release from dissociated pituitary cells by dimerization of occupied LHRH receptors.

Authors:  H Gregory; C L Taylor; C R Hopkins
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1982-11-18       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Gonadotropin releasing hormone activation is mediated by dimerization of occupied receptors.

Authors:  E Hazum; D Keinan
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1985-12-17       Impact factor: 3.575

8.  Ovarian stimulation for assisted reproduction with HMG and concomitant midcycle administration of the GnRH antagonist cetrorelix according to the multiple dose protocol: a prospective uncontrolled phase III study.

Authors:  R E Felberbaum; C Albano; M Ludwig; H Riethmüller-Winzen; M Grigat; P Devroey; K Diedrich
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Cumulative conception and live-birth rates after in vitro fertilization with and without the use of long, short, and ultrashort regimens of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist buserelin.

Authors:  S L Tan; N Maconochie; P Doyle; S Campbell; A Balen; J Bekir; P Brinsden; R G Edwards; H S Jacobs
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Hormonal responses to the new potent GnRH antagonist Cetrorelix.

Authors:  D Klingmüller; M Schepke; C Enzweiler; F Bidlingmaier
Journal:  Acta Endocrinol (Copenh)       Date:  1993-01
View more
  5 in total

1.  The effects of GnRH antagonist on the endometrium of normally menstruating women.

Authors:  Porntip Sirayapiwat; Somchai Suwajanakorn; Surang Triratanachat; Somchai Niruthisard
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-11-30       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  [Effects of cetrorelix versus ganirelix in gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist cycles for preventing premature luteinizing hormone surges and on clinical outcomes of IVF-ET cycles].

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Xingyu Zhou; Yingxue Chen; Qingyan Zhang; Ying Li; Jing Zhe; Xin Chen; Shiling Chen
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2019-10-30

3.  Comparison of the GnRH agonist and antagonist protocol on the same patients in assisted reproduction during controlled ovarian stimulation cycles.

Authors:  Qiaohong Lai; Hanwang Zhang; Guijing Zhu; Yufeng Li; Lei Jin; Long He; Zhijun Zhang; Ping Yang; Qilin Yu; Shu Zhang; Jun-Fa Xu; Cong-Yi Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2013-08-15

4.  GnRH agonist versus GnRH antagonist in assisted reproduction cycles: oocyte morphology.

Authors:  Ana Marcia M Cota; Joao Batista A Oliveira; Claudia G Petersen; Ana L Mauri; Fabiana C Massaro; Liliane F I Silva; Andreia Nicoletti; Mario Cavagna; Ricardo L R Baruffi; José G Franco
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 5.211

5.  Reduction of the cetrorelix dose in a multiple-dose antagonist protocol and its impact on pregnancy rate and affordability: A randomized controlled multicenter study.

Authors:  Ayman S Dawood; Adel Algergawy; Ahmed Elhalwagy
Journal:  Clin Exp Reprod Med       Date:  2017-12-31
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.