Literature DB >> 12405897

Improving doctors' letters.

Martin H N Tattersall1, Phyllis N Butow, Judith E Brown, John F Thompson.   

Abstract

Information contained in letters of referral and reply often does not meet the information needs of letter recipients. Missing reports of previous investigations and insufficient detail in the referral letter to specialists are the most serious and common problems. General practitioners prefer structured, computer-generated letters to unstructured, dictated letters. Referring surgeons and GPs identify delay in receiving the reply letter and insufficient detail as relatively common problems after a new patient consultation. They want the reply letter to describe the proposed treatment, expected outcomes and any psychosocial concerns, yet these items are often omitted. A letter content and format prompt card has the potential to enhance the quality of correspondence between medical specialists and referring doctors. Specialist medical bodies should consider preparing prompt cards (setting out preferred information content and format for letters) to distribute to their members.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12405897     DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04926.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  21 in total

Review 1.  The interface between primary and oncology specialty care: treatment through survivorship.

Authors:  Eva Grunfeld; Craig C Earle
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

2.  Tool to assess the quality of consultation and referral request letters in family medicine.

Authors:  José François
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Psychologists' views of inter-disciplinary psychosocial communication within the cancer care team.

Authors:  B Thewes; P Butow; E Davis; J Turner; C Mason
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Referral letters to the psychiatrist in Nigeria: is communication adequate?

Authors:  Oluyomi Esan; Oluremi Oladele
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 0.927

5.  Epilepsy audit: do we document everything?

Authors:  M Iqbal; S Bilal; S Sarwar; R P Murphy
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 1.568

6.  A brief, low-cost intervention improves the quality of ambulatory gastroenterology consultation notes.

Authors:  Justin L Sewell; Lukejohn W Day; Delphine S Tuot; Ricardo Alvarez; Albert Yu; Alice Hm Chen
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  "I Found it on the Internet": Preparing for the e-patient in Oman.

Authors:  Ken Masters; Dick Ng'ambi; Gail Todd
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2010-07-19

8.  Primary-to-secondary care referral experience of suspected colorectal malignancy in young adults.

Authors:  K Patel; T Doulias; T Hoad; C Lee; J C Alberts
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 9.  Enhancing continuity of information: essential components of consultation reports.

Authors:  Whitney Berta; Jan Barnsley; Jeff Bloom; Rhonda Cockerill; Dave Davis; Liisa Jaakkimainen; Anne Marie Mior; Yves Talbot; Eugene Vayda
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.275

10.  Enhancing quality of trainee-written consultation notes.

Authors:  Delphine S Tuot; Niraj L Sehgal; Naama Neeman; Andrew Auerbach
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 4.965

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.