Literature DB >> 24972585

Psychologists' views of inter-disciplinary psychosocial communication within the cancer care team.

B Thewes1, P Butow, E Davis, J Turner, C Mason.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is known about how psychologists working in cancer care centres communicate clinical information to other members of the multidisciplinary team or what information is communicated.
PURPOSE: This study surveyed Australian cancer care psychologists regarding their communication practices and their views on barriers to and facilitators of effective inter-disciplinary communication.
METHODS: Psychologists were invited to complete an online survey containing purpose-designed items that addressed study aims.
RESULTS: Forty-four psychologists completed the survey. Psychologists' most common method of recording initial consultations was in patient medical records, with 69 % of respondents recording notes in either most of the time or all of the time. Twenty-two percent of psychologists said they did not regularly feedback the results of an initial assessment to a referrer and more than 40 % used verbal and e-mail communication to do so.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides data that will assist in the development of guidelines for inter-professional communication between psychologists and other members of the cancer care team.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24972585     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-014-2299-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  13 in total

1.  Improving doctors' letters.

Authors:  Martin H N Tattersall; Phyllis N Butow; Judith E Brown; John F Thompson
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2002-11-04       Impact factor: 7.738

2.  Oncologists and family physicians. Using a standardized letter to improve communication.

Authors:  Ted C Braun; Neil A Hagen; Colum Smith; Nancy Summers
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  The origins of multidisciplinary cancer care.

Authors:  Thomas W Burke
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  A qualitative study of consumer attitudes to sharing psychosocial information within the multidisciplinary cancer care team.

Authors:  Esther Davis; Belinda Thewes; Phyllis Butow; Catherine Mason
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-01-12       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Multidisciplinary breast cancer clinics. Do they work?

Authors:  M Gabel; N E Hilton; S D Nathanson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1997-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Communication between primary care physicians and radiation oncologists regarding patients with cancer treated with palliative radiotherapy.

Authors:  E A Barnes; J Hanson; C M Neumann; C L Nekolaichuk; E Bruera
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  ABC conceptual model of effective multidisciplinary cancer care.

Authors:  Naoto T Ueno; T David Ito; R Kevin Grigsby; Melanie V Black; Janis Apted
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 66.675

8.  The impact of a multidisciplinary breast cancer center on recommendations for patient management: the University of Pennsylvania experience.

Authors:  J H Chang; E Vines; H Bertsch; D L Fraker; B J Czerniecki; E F Rosato; T Lawton; E F Conant; S G Orel; L Schuchter; K R Fox; N Zieber; J H Glick; L J Solin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Written communication from specialists to general practitioners in cancer care. What are the expectations and how are they met?

Authors:  J Stålhammar; L Holmberg; K Svärdsudd; G Tibblin
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.581

10.  Increasing social and psychological information conveyed to General Practitioners after bad news consultations by use of separate letters from the Lung Cancer Nurse Specialist.

Authors:  F Jaafar; A G Davison; T Beaty; C D Eraut; A S Haque; A Lamont; C W Trask
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.705

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.