Literature DB >> 12396565

Optimal short-term population coding: when Fisher information fails.

M Bethge1, D Rotermund, K Pawelzik.   

Abstract

Efficient coding has been proposed as a first principle explaining neuronal response properties in the central nervous system. The shape of optimal codes, however, strongly depends on the natural limitations of the particular physical system. Here we investigate how optimal neuronal encoding strategies are influenced by the finite number of neurons N (place constraint), the limited decoding time window length T (time constraint), the maximum neuronal firing rate f(max) (power constraint), and the maximal average rate (f)(max) (energy constraint). While Fisher information provides a general lower bound for the mean squared error of unbiased signal reconstruction, its use to characterize the coding precision is limited. Analyzing simple examples, we illustrate some typical pitfalls and thereby show that Fisher information provides a valid measure for the precision of a code only if the dynamic range (f(min)T, f(max)T) is sufficiently large. In particular, we demonstrate that the optimal width of gaussian tuning curves depends on the available decoding time T. Within the broader class of unimodal tuning functions, it turns out that the shape of a Fisher-optimal coding scheme is not unique. We solve this ambiguity by taking the minimum mean square error into account, which leads to flat tuning curves. The tuning width, however, remains to be determined by energy constraints rather than by the principle of efficient coding.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12396565     DOI: 10.1162/08997660260293247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neural Comput        ISSN: 0899-7667            Impact factor:   2.026


  21 in total

1.  Optimal stimulus coding by neural populations using rate codes.

Authors:  Don H Johnson; Will Ray
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  The effect of noise correlations in populations of diversely tuned neurons.

Authors:  Alexander S Ecker; Philipp Berens; Andreas S Tolias; Matthias Bethge
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Explaining the especially pink elephant.

Authors:  Jonathan W Pillow
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Origin of information-limiting noise correlations.

Authors:  Ingmar Kanitscheider; Ruben Coen-Cagli; Alexandre Pouget
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Reassessing optimal neural population codes with neurometric functions.

Authors:  Philipp Berens; Alexander S Ecker; Sebastian Gerwinn; Andreas S Tolias; Matthias Bethge
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Grid cells generate an analog error-correcting code for singularly precise neural computation.

Authors:  Sameet Sreenivasan; Ila Fiete
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-11       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Error-based analysis of optimal tuning functions explains phenomena observed in sensory neurons.

Authors:  Steve Yaeli; Ron Meir
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 2.380

8.  A principle of economy predicts the functional architecture of grid cells.

Authors:  Xue-Xin Wei; Jason Prentice; Vijay Balasubramanian
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Efficient sensory encoding and Bayesian inference with heterogeneous neural populations.

Authors:  Deep Ganguli; Eero P Simoncelli
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 2.026

10.  Implicit encoding of prior probabilities in optimal neural populations.

Authors:  Deep Ganguli; Eero P Simoncelli
Journal:  Adv Neural Inf Process Syst       Date:  2010
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.