Literature DB >> 12395861

Impacts of swine manure pits on groundwater quality.

I G Krapac1, W S Dey, W R Roy, C A Smyth, E Storment, S L Sargent, J D Steele.   

Abstract

Manure deep-pits are commonly used to store manure at confined animal feeding operations. However, previous to this study little information had been collected on the impacts of deep-pits on groundwater quality to provide science-based guidance in formulating regulations and waste management strategies that address risks to human health and the environment. Groundwater quality has been monitored since January 1999 at two hog finishing facilities in Illinois that use deep-pit systems for manure storage. Groundwater samples were collected on a monthly basis and analyzed for inorganic and bacteriological constituent concentrations. The two sites are located in areas with geologic environments representing different vulnerabilities for local groundwater contamination. One site is underlain by more than 6 m of clayey silt, and 7-36 m of shale. Concentrations of chloride, ammonium, phosphate, and potassium indicated that local groundwater quality had not been significantly impacted by pit leakage from this facility. Nitrate concentrations were elevated near the pit, often exceeding the 10 mg N/l drinking water standard. Isotopic nitrate signatures suggested that the nitrate was likely derived from soil organic matter and fertilizer applied to adjacent crop fields. At the other site, sandstone is located 4.6-6.1 m below land surface. Chloride concentrations and delta15N and delta15O values of dissolved nitrate indicated that this facility may have limited and localized impacts on groundwater. Other constituents, including ammonia, potassium, phosphate, and sodium were generally at or less than background concentrations. Trace- and heavy-metal concentrations in groundwater samples collected from both facilities were at concentrations less than drinking water standards. The concentration of inorganic constituents in the groundwater would not likely impact human health. Fecal streptococcus bacteria were detected at least once in groundwater from all monitoring wells at both sites. Fecal streptococcus was more common and at greater concentrations than fecal coliform. The microbiological data suggest that filtration of bacteria by soils may not be as effective as commonly assumed. The presence of fecal bacteria in the shallow groundwater may pose a significant threat to human health if the ground water is used for drinking. Both facilities are less than 4 years old and the short-term impacts of these manure storage facilities on groundwater quality have been limited. Continued monitoring of these facilities will determine if they have a long-term impact on groundwater resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12395861     DOI: 10.1016/s0269-7491(02)00115-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Pollut        ISSN: 0269-7491            Impact factor:   8.071


  14 in total

1.  Tracking nitrate sources in the Chaohu Lake, China, using the nitrogen and oxygen isotopic approach.

Authors:  Qibiao Yu; Fang Wang; Xinyan Li; Weijin Yan; Yanqiang Li; Shucong Lv
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Monitoring and source tracking of tetracycline resistance genes in lagoons and groundwater adjacent to swine production facilities over a 3-year period.

Authors:  S Koike; I G Krapac; H D Oliver; A C Yannarell; J C Chee-Sanford; R I Aminov; R I Mackie
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-06-01       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Effects of combined sewer overflow and stormwater on indicator bacteria concentrations in the Tama River due to the high population density of Tokyo Metropolitan area.

Authors:  Young-Sik Ham; Hiromi Kobori; Masahisa Takasago
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2008-05-17       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Ground water quality in the Kathmandu valley of Nepal.

Authors:  Bhoj Raj Pant
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Source tracking swine fecal waste in surface water proximal to swine concentrated animal feeding operations.

Authors:  Christopher D Heaney; Kevin Myers; Steve Wing; Devon Hall; Dothula Baron; Jill R Stewart
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2015-01-17       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  Evaluation of swine-specific PCR assays used for fecal source tracking and analysis of molecular diversity of swine-specific "bacteroidales" populations.

Authors:  Regina Lamendella; Jorge W Santo Domingo; Anthony C Yannarell; Shreya Ghosh; George Di Giovanni; Roderick I Mackie; Daniel B Oerther
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Monitoring of nitrates in drinking water from agricultural and residential areas of Podravina and Prigorje (Croatia).

Authors:  Jasna Nemčić-Jurec; Miljenko Konjačić; Anamarija Jazbec
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Monitoring the perturbation of soil and groundwater microbial communities due to pig production activities.

Authors:  Pei-Ying Hong; Anthony C Yannarell; Qinghua Dai; Melike Ekizoglu; Roderick I Mackie
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Development of a swine-specific fecal pollution marker based on host differences in methanogen mcrA genes.

Authors:  Jennifer A Ufnar; David F Ufnar; Shiao Y Wang; R D Ellender
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Antibiotic-resistant enterococci and fecal indicators in surface water and groundwater impacted by a concentrated Swine feeding operation.

Authors:  Amy R Sapkota; Frank C Curriero; Kristen E Gibson; Kellogg J Schwab
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.