Anna B Reisman1, Cary P Gross. 1. Yale University School of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prior studies have shown that mentors are very important for career development of physicians, and that many female physicians have not had a mentor during their training. However, little is known about the availability of mentors for residents. PURPOSE: To identify resident and program characteristics that were associated with the ability to identify a potential mentor at resident morning report. METHOD: We performed a cross-sectional survey of 356 internal medicine residents at a convenience sample of 13 residency programs. The instrument included questions about demographic characteristics, subspecialty fellowship plans, and ability to identify a potential mentor at morning report during the previous 6 months. RESULTS: Seventy-three percent were able to identify a potential mentor at morning report within the previous 6 months (63% of women vs. 79% of men). Among residents planning on entering general internal medicine, women were less likely than men to be able to identify a potential mentor (55% vs. 77%). The likelihood of identifying a mentor varied between the different programs, with a range from 27% to 89%. CONCLUSION: Many residents could identify a potential mentor at morning report, although there was a wide variability between programs. Female residents who were going into general internal medicine were less likely than their male colleagues to find a potential mentor. Medical educators should ensure that all residents have exposure to potential generalist mentors.
BACKGROUND: Prior studies have shown that mentors are very important for career development of physicians, and that many female physicians have not had a mentor during their training. However, little is known about the availability of mentors for residents. PURPOSE: To identify resident and program characteristics that were associated with the ability to identify a potential mentor at resident morning report. METHOD: We performed a cross-sectional survey of 356 internal medicine residents at a convenience sample of 13 residency programs. The instrument included questions about demographic characteristics, subspecialty fellowship plans, and ability to identify a potential mentor at morning report during the previous 6 months. RESULTS: Seventy-three percent were able to identify a potential mentor at morning report within the previous 6 months (63% of women vs. 79% of men). Among residents planning on entering general internal medicine, women were less likely than men to be able to identify a potential mentor (55% vs. 77%). The likelihood of identifying a mentor varied between the different programs, with a range from 27% to 89%. CONCLUSION: Many residents could identify a potential mentor at morning report, although there was a wide variability between programs. Female residents who were going into general internal medicine were less likely than their male colleagues to find a potential mentor. Medical educators should ensure that all residents have exposure to potential generalist mentors.