BACKGROUND: Women in medicine report many gender-specific barriers to their career success and satisfaction, including a lack of mentors and role models. The literature calls for innovative strategies to enhance mentorship for women in medicine. OBJECTIVE: To describe the content, perceived value, and ongoing achievements of a mentoring program for women in emergency medicine. METHODS: The program offered mentoring for female faculty and residents in an academic emergency medicine department. Volunteers participated in group mentoring sessions using a mosaic of vertical and peer mentoring. Sessions focused on topics specific to women in medicine. An anonymous, electronic survey was sent to women who participated during 2004-2010 to assess the perceived value of the program and to collect qualitative feedback. Preliminary achievements fulfilling the program's goals were tracked. RESULTS: A total of 46 women (64%) completed the survey. The results showed a positive perceived value of the program (average, 4.65 on a 5-point Likert scale) in providing mentors and role models (4.41), in offering a supportive environment (4.39), in providing discussions pertinent to both personal (4.22) and professional development (4.22), while expanding networking opportunities (4.07). Notable achievements included work on the creation of a family leave policy, establishing lactation space, collaboration on projects, awards, and academic advancement. CONCLUSION: This innovative model for mentoring women is perceived as a valuable asset to the academic department and residency. It offers the unique combination of expanding a female mentor pool by recruiting alumni and using a mosaic of vertical and peer mentoring.
BACKGROUND:Women in medicine report many gender-specific barriers to their career success and satisfaction, including a lack of mentors and role models. The literature calls for innovative strategies to enhance mentorship for women in medicine. OBJECTIVE: To describe the content, perceived value, and ongoing achievements of a mentoring program for women in emergency medicine. METHODS: The program offered mentoring for female faculty and residents in an academic emergency medicine department. Volunteers participated in group mentoring sessions using a mosaic of vertical and peer mentoring. Sessions focused on topics specific to women in medicine. An anonymous, electronic survey was sent to women who participated during 2004-2010 to assess the perceived value of the program and to collect qualitative feedback. Preliminary achievements fulfilling the program's goals were tracked. RESULTS: A total of 46 women (64%) completed the survey. The results showed a positive perceived value of the program (average, 4.65 on a 5-point Likert scale) in providing mentors and role models (4.41), in offering a supportive environment (4.39), in providing discussions pertinent to both personal (4.22) and professional development (4.22), while expanding networking opportunities (4.07). Notable achievements included work on the creation of a family leave policy, establishing lactation space, collaboration on projects, awards, and academic advancement. CONCLUSION: This innovative model for mentoring women is perceived as a valuable asset to the academic department and residency. It offers the unique combination of expanding a female mentor pool by recruiting alumni and using a mosaic of vertical and peer mentoring.
Authors: Victoria H Coleman; Michael L Power; Sterling Williams; Andrea Carpentieri; Jay Schulkin Journal: J Contin Educ Health Prof Date: 2005 Impact factor: 1.355
Authors: Sharon Dannels; Jean McLaughlin; Katharine A Gleason; Sharon A McDade; Rosalyn Richman; Page S Morahan Journal: Acad Med Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Rina Dutta; Sarah L Hawkes; Elizabeth Kuipers; David Guest; Nicola T Fear; Amy C Iversen Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2011-04-07 Impact factor: 2.463
Authors: Amy H Farkas; Eliana Bonifacino; Rose Turner; Sarah A Tilstra; Jennifer A Corbelli Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Abraham A Brody; Linda Edelman; Elena O Siegel; Victoria Foster; Donald E Bailey; Ashley Leak Bryant; Stewart M Bond Journal: Nurs Outlook Date: 2016-04-04 Impact factor: 3.250
Authors: Ashley Leak Bryant; Abraham Aizer Brody; Adriana Perez; Casey Shillam; Linda S Edelman; Stewart M Bond; Victoria Foster; Elena O Siegel Journal: J Nurs Scholarsh Date: 2015-03-25 Impact factor: 3.176
Authors: Linda Regan; Michael A Gisondi; Jeremy Branzetti; Meghan Mitchell; Michelle Romeo; Caroline Kayko; Laura R Hopson Journal: AEM Educ Train Date: 2021-08-01