Literature DB >> 12394965

Minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring for the intensivist: current and emerging technology.

John C Chaney1, Stephen Derdak.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring devices currently available for use in the intensive care unit. DATA SOURCES: Medline search from 1966 to present plus cited reference studies and abstracts from available product literature. STUDY SELECTION: Selection criteria included published reports and abstracts comparing the accuracy of minimally invasive cardiac output monitors to a "gold standard." DATA SYNTHESIS: Many reports have been published on the accuracy of individual minimally invasive cardiac output monitors, but cumulative data reviewing each type of monitor have not been synthesized and made available to the clinician.
CONCLUSIONS: Emerging noninvasive or minimally invasive means of cardiac output monitoring are based on varied physiologic principles and can be used for following hemodynamic trends. Each of these methods has advantages and disadvantages; it is important for the clinician to understand the strengths and limitations of each device to effectively use the information derived.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12394965     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200210000-00025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  18 in total

1.  Inhaled nitric oxide for ARDS: searching for a more focused use.

Authors:  Luca M Bigatello; Judith Hellman
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  What's in a beat?

Authors:  Mervyn Singer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  A novel approach to measure cardiac output noninvasively: a comparison with the thermodilution method on critical care patients.

Authors:  John Kabal; Bruce K Lagerman
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Peripheral vascular decoupling in porcine endotoxic shock.

Authors:  Feras Hatib; Jos R C Jansen; Michael R Pinsky
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2011-06-23

5.  Sonography as an alternative to radiography for nasogastric feeding tube location.

Authors:  Cécile Vigneau; Jean-Luc Baudel; Bertrand Guidet; Georges Offenstadt; Eric Maury
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-09-20       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Cardiac index measurements by transcutaneous Doppler ultrasound and transthoracic echocardiography in adult and pediatric emergency patients.

Authors:  H Bryant Nguyen; Daryl P Banta; Gail Stewart; Tommy Kim; Ramesh Bansal; James Anholm; William A Wittlake; Stephen W Corbett
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 2.502

7.  Transthoracic electrical bioimpedence cardiac output: comparison with multigated equillibrium radionuclide cardiography.

Authors:  Arunodaya R Gujjar; K Muralidhar; Abhijit Bhandopadhyaya; T N Sathyaprabha; P Janaki; B K Mahalla; Ratan Gupta; Sanjay Banakal; P S Jairaj
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2010-03-13       Impact factor: 2.502

8.  The impact of ischemic preconditioning on hemodynamic, biochemical and inflammatory alterations induced by intra-abdominal hypertension: an experimental study in a porcine model.

Authors:  Alexandra Avraamidou; Athanasios Marinis; Spyridon Asonitis; Despoina Perrea; Georgios Polymeneas; Dionysios Voros; Eriphili Argyra
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  Validation of an Ultrasound Cardiac Output Monitor as a Bedside Tool for Pediatric Patients.

Authors:  Fernando Beltramo; Jondavid Menteer; Asma Razavi; Robinder G Khemani; Jacqueline Szmuszkovicz; Christopher J L Newth; Patrick A Ross
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2015-09-12       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 10.  The validity of trans-esophageal Doppler ultrasonography as a measure of cardiac output in critically ill adults.

Authors:  Paul M Dark; Mervyn Singer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-09-11       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.