Literature DB >> 12392836

Functional abnormalities in patients with permanent right ventricular pacing: the effect of sites of electrical stimulation.

Hung Fat Tse1, Cannas Yu, Kwong Kuen Wong, Vella Tsang, Yim Lung Leung, Wai Yin Ho, Chu Pak Lau.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the long-term effects of alternative right ventricular pacing sites on myocardial function and perfusion.
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have demonstrated that asynchronous ventricular activation due to right ventricular apical (RVA) pacing alters regional myocardial perfusion and functions.
METHODS: We randomized 24 patients with complete atrioventricular block to undergo permanent ventricular stimulation either at the RVA (n = 12) or right ventricular outflow (RVOT) (n = 12). All patients underwent dipyridamole thallium myocardial scintigraphy and radionuclide ventriculography at 6 and 18 months after pacemaker implantation.
RESULTS: After pacing, the mean QRS duration was significantly longer during RVA pacing than during RVOT pacing (151 +/- 6 vs. 134 +/- 4 ms, p = 0.03). At six months, the incidence of myocardial perfusion defects (50% vs. 25%) and regional wall motion abnormalities (42% vs. 25%) and the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (55 +/- 3% vs. 55 +/- 1%) were similar during RVA pacing and RVOT pacing (p > 0.05). However, at 18 months, the incidence of myocardial perfusion defects (83% vs. 33%) and regional wall motion abnormalities (75% vs. 33%) were higher and LVEF (47 +/- 3 vs. 56 +/- 1%) was lower during RVA pacing than during RVOT pacing (all p < 0.05). Patients with RVA pacing had a significant increase in the incidence of myocardial perfusion defects (p < 0.05) and a decrease in LVEF (p < 0.01) between 6 and 18 months, but patients with RVOT pacing did not (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that preserved synchronous ventricular activation with RVOT pacing prevents the long-term deleterious effects of RVA pacing on myocardial perfusion and function in patients implanted with a permanent pacemaker.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12392836     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02169-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  59 in total

1.  AV interval optimization using pressure volume loops in dual chamber pacemaker patients with maintained systolic left ventricular function.

Authors:  Frank Eberhardt; Thorsten Hanke; Joern Fitschen; Matthias Heringlake; Frank Bode; Heribert Schunkert; Uwe K H Wiegand
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 2.  Window to the heart: the value of a native and paced QRS duration. Current perspective and review.

Authors:  Himanshu H Shukla; Erskine A James; John A Schutz; Benjamin F Lloyd; Greg C Flaker
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 3.  Right ventricular pacing, mechanical dyssynchrony, and heart failure.

Authors:  Alan J Bank; Ryan M Gage; Kevin V Burns
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Interventricular septal or standard apical pacing in pacing dependent patients: still a dilemma?

Authors:  Roxana Cristina Rimbas Sisu; Mircea Cinteza; Dragos Vinereanu
Journal:  Maedica (Buchar)       Date:  2010-07

Review 5.  Strategic choices to reduce implantable cardioverter-defibrillator-related morbidity.

Authors:  Oussama Wazni; Bruce L Wilkoff
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 32.419

6.  Permanent direct his bundle pacing does not induce ventricular dyssynchrony unlike conventional right ventricular apical pacing. An intrapatient acute comparison study.

Authors:  Domenico Catanzariti; Massimiliano Maines; Claudio Cemin; Gianpaolo Broso; Tiziana Marotta; Giuseppe Vergara
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2006-11-18       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 7.  Right ventricular outflow tract pacing: not ready for prime-time.

Authors:  S Serge Barold; Bengt Herweg
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.900

8.  Future easy and physiological cardiac pacing.

Authors:  Eraldo Occhetta; Miriam Bortnik; Paolo Marino
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2011-01-26

Review 9.  New concepts in physiologic cardiac pacing.

Authors:  Dwight W Reynolds; Christina M Murray
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 10.  [His-bundle stimulation and alternative RV stimulation sites].

Authors:  G Fröhlig; M Kindermann
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2008-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.