Literature DB >> 12391423

Double potential interval and transisthmus conduction time for prediction of cavotricuspid isthmus block after ablation of typical atrial flutter.

Ching-Tai Tai1, Azizul Haque, Yung-Kuo Lin, Hsuan-Ming Tsao, Yu-An Ding, Mau-Song Chang, Shih-Ann Chen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Complete bi-directional isthmus block is the endpoint of typical atrial flutter ablation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility of the local double potential (DP) interval and the change in transisthmus conduction time for predicting complete isthmus block after ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus.
METHODS: The study population consisted of 32 patients with typical atrial flutter after a procedure of radiofrequency (RF) ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus (16 had incomplete block and 16 had complete block). The transisthmus conduction time was determined during pacing from the proximal coronary sinus and low lateral right atrium before and after RF ablation. The DP interval close to the ablation line was evaluated after final RF energy application.
RESULTS: In the counterclockwise direction, transisthmus conduction time had an increase of 37 +/- 25.4% and 127.3 +/- 35.5% (P < 0.001), and the DP interval was 63.3 +/- 8.7 ms and 120 +/- 17.4 ms (P < 0.001) after achievement of incomplete and complete block, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of an increase in the transisthmus conduction time > or =50% were 100%, 81%, 84% and 100%, respectively; those of DP interval > or =100 ms were 100%. In the clockwise direction, transisthmus conduction time had an increase of 38.8 +/- 28.6% and 135.7 +/- 63.6% (P < 0.001), and the DP interval was 63.6 +/- 13.8 ms and 127.7 +/- 27.1 ms (P < 0.001) after achievement of incomplete and complete block, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of an increase in the transisthmus conduction time > or =50% were 100%, 67%, 83% and 100%, respectively; those of the DP interval > or =100 ms were 100%.
CONCLUSIONS: The transisthmus conduction time > or =50% increase or DP interval > or =100 ms was feasible to predict complete bi-directional isthmus block.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12391423     DOI: 10.1023/a:1020876317859

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1383-875X            Impact factor:   1.900


  18 in total

1.  Is 8-mm more effective than 4-mm tip electrode catheter for ablation of typical atrial flutter?

Authors:  C F Tsai; C T Tai; W C Yu; Y J Chen; M H Hsieh; C E Chiang; Y A Ding; M S Chang; S A Chen
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-08-17       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Typical atrial flutter ablation: conduction across the posterior region of the inferior vena cava orifice may mimic unidirectional isthmus block.

Authors:  M Scaglione; R Riccardi; L Calò; P Di Donna; F Lamberti; D Caponi; L Coda; F Gaita
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-04

3.  Catheter ablation of typical atrial flutter: a randomized comparison of 2 methods for determining complete bidirectional isthmus block.

Authors:  F Anselme; A Savouré; A Cribier; N Saoudi
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-03-13       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Rate-dependent conduction block of the crista terminalis in patients with typical atrial flutter: influence on evaluation of cavotricuspid isthmus conduction block.

Authors:  A Arenal; J Almendral; J M Alday; J Villacastín; J M Ormaetxe; J L Sande; N Perez-Castellano; S Gonzalez; M Ortiz; J L Delcán
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-06-01       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial flutter. Further insights into the various types of isthmus block: application to ablation during sinus rhythm.

Authors:  H Poty; N Saoudi; M Nair; F Anselme; B Letac
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1996-12-15       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Local electrogram-based criteria of cavotricuspid isthmus block.

Authors:  D C Shah; A Takahashi; P Jaïs; M Hocini; J Clémenty; M Haïssaguerre
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  1999-05

7.  Electrogram polarity and cavotricuspid isthmus block during ablation of typical atrial flutter.

Authors:  H Tada; H Oral; C Sticherling; S P Chough; R L Baker; K Wasmer; M H Kim; F Pelosi; G F Michaud; B P Knight; S A Strickberger; F Morady
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2001-04

8.  Electrophysiological effects of catheter ablation of inferior vena cava-tricuspid annulus isthmus in common atrial flutter.

Authors:  B Cauchemez; M Haissaguerre; B Fischer; O Thomas; J Clementy; P Coumel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1996-01-15       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Radiofrequency catheter ablation of common atrial flutter: significance of palpitations and quality-of-life evaluation in patients with proven isthmus block.

Authors:  F Anselme; N Saoudi; H Poty; R Douillet; A Cribier
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-02-02       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Radiofrequency catheter ablation of type 1 atrial flutter. Prediction of late success by electrophysiological criteria.

Authors:  H Poty; N Saoudi; A Abdel Aziz; M Nair; B Letac
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-09-15       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  9 in total

1.  Usefulness of the polarity in high-density wide range-filtered bipolar mapping to detect isthmus block during radiofrequency ablation of typical atrial flutter.

Authors:  Yasuo Okumura; Ichiro Watanabe; Takeshi Yamada; Kimie Ohkubo; Kazunori Kawauchi; Sonoko Ashino; Yasuhiro Takagi; Hidezou Sugimura; Kenichi Hashimoto; Atsushi Shindo; Satoshi Saito
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Anatomical peculiarities of the cavo-tricuspid isthmus in the human heart.

Authors:  Bozena Pejković; Ivan Krajnc
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.704

3.  A new and simple method for distinguishing complete from incomplete block through the cavotricuspid isthmus.

Authors:  Gabriel Laurent; Alexandra Bourcier; Géraldine Bertaux; Stéphane Fromentin; Michel Fraison; Stéphanie Gonzalez; François Saint Pierre; Jean Eric Wolf
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  What is the best endpoint for ablating atrial flutter?

Authors:  D E Krummen; S M Narayan
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Electrophysiology of a gap created on the canine atrium.

Authors:  Kei Yano; Kenzo Hirao; Tomoe Horikawa; Michio Tanaka; Mitsuaki Isobe
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 6.  Typical Atrial Flutter - When Do You Say You Have Got It.

Authors:  Michaël Peyrol; Pascal Sbragia
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2012-10-06

7.  New insights into typical atrial flutter ablation: extra-isthmus activation time on the flutter wave is predictive of extra-isthmus conduction time after isthmus block.

Authors:  Decebal Gabriel Latcu; Sok-Sithikun Bun; Mathieu Arnoult; Philippe Ricard; Jean-Paul Rinaldi; Nadir Saoudi
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 1.900

8.  Lone Atrial Flutter in Children and Adolescents: Is It Really "Lone"?

Authors:  Jana-K Dieks; David Backhoff; Heike E Schneider; Matthias J Müller; Ulrich Krause; Thomas Paul
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 1.655

9.  Variable procedural strategies adapted to anatomical characteristics in catheter ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus using a preoperative multidetector computed tomography analysis.

Authors:  Kenta Kajihara; Yukiko Nakano; Yukoh Hirai; Hiroshi Ogi; Noboru Oda; Kazuyoshi Suenari; Yuko Makita; Akinori Sairaku; Takehito Tokuyama; Chikaaki Motoda; Mai Fujiwara; Yoshikazu Watanabe; Masao Kiguchi; Yasuki Kihara
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-12
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.