Literature DB >> 10351971

Rate-dependent conduction block of the crista terminalis in patients with typical atrial flutter: influence on evaluation of cavotricuspid isthmus conduction block.

A Arenal1, J Almendral, J M Alday, J Villacastín, J M Ormaetxe, J L Sande, N Perez-Castellano, S Gonzalez, M Ortiz, J L Delcán.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The crista terminalis (CT) has been identified as the posterior boundary of typical atrial flutter (AFL) in the lateral wall (LW) of the right atrium (RA). To study conduction properties across the CT, rapid pacing was performed at both sides of the CT after bidirectional conduction block was achieved in the cavotricuspid isthmus by radiofrequency catheter ablation. METHODS AND
RESULTS: In 22 patients (aged 61+/-7 years) with AFL (cycle length, 234+/-23 ms), CT was identified during AFL by double electrograms recorded between the LW and posterior wall (PW). After the ablation procedure, decremental pacing trains were delivered from 600 ms to 2-to-1 local capture at the LW and PW or coronary sinus ostium (CSO). At least 5 bipolar electrograms were recorded along the CT from the high to the low atrium next to the inferior vena cava. No double electrograms were recorded during sinus rhythm in that area. Complete transversal conduction block all along the CT (detected by the appearance of double electrograms at all recording sites and craniocaudal activation sequence on the side opposite to the pacing site) was observed in all patients during pacing from the PW or CSO (cycle length, 334+/-136 ms), but it was fixed in only 4 patients. During pacing from the LW, complete block appeared at a shorter pacing cycle length (281+/-125 ms; P<0.01) and was fixed in 2 patients. In 3 patients, complete block was not achieved.
CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest the presence of rate-dependent transversal conduction block at the crista terminalis in patients with typical AFL. Block is usually observed at longer pacing cycle lengths with PW pacing than with LW pacing. This difference may be a critical determinant of the counterclockwise rotation of typical AFL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10351971     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.99.21.2771

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  14 in total

1.  Double potential interval and transisthmus conduction time for prediction of cavotricuspid isthmus block after ablation of typical atrial flutter.

Authors:  Ching-Tai Tai; Azizul Haque; Yung-Kuo Lin; Hsuan-Ming Tsao; Yu-An Ding; Mau-Song Chang; Shih-Ann Chen
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Electrophysiological mechanisms of atrial flutter.

Authors:  Ching-Tai Tai; Shin-Ann Chen
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2006-04-01

3.  Differential pacing for distinguishing slow conduction from complete conduction block of the tricuspid-inferior vena cava isthmus after radiofrequency ablation for atrial flutter--role of transverse conduction through the crista terminalis.

Authors:  Hidezou Sugimura; Ichiro Watanabe; Yasuo Okumura; Kimie Ohkubo; Sonoko Ashino; Toshiko Nakai; Yuji Kasamaki; Satoshi Saito
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  A new and simple method for distinguishing complete from incomplete block through the cavotricuspid isthmus.

Authors:  Gabriel Laurent; Alexandra Bourcier; Géraldine Bertaux; Stéphane Fromentin; Michel Fraison; Stéphanie Gonzalez; François Saint Pierre; Jean Eric Wolf
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Atrial Flutter, Typical and Atypical: A Review.

Authors:  Francisco G Cosío
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2017-06

Review 6.  Management of atrial flutter.

Authors:  E Kongsgaard; H Aass
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  Assessment of ability of activation mapping by duodecapolar catheter to diagnose complete isthmus block utilizing electroanatomical mapping system.

Authors:  Kiyoshi Otomo; Takashi Noda; Eiichiro Nakagawa; Kazuhiro Satomi; Wataru Shimizu; Kazuhiro Suyama; Takashi Kurita; Naohiko Aihara; Shiro Kamakura
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 1.900

8.  Association of Rate-Dependent Conduction Block Between Eccentric Coronary Sinus to Left Atrial Connections With Inducible Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter.

Authors:  Dong Huang; Joseph E Marine; Jing-Bo Li; Tarek Zghaib; Esra Gucuk Ipek; Sunil Sinha; David D Spragg; Hiroshi Ashikaga; Ronald D Berger; Hugh Calkins; Saman Nazarian
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-01

9.  Upper turnaround point of the reentry circuit of common atrial flutter--three-dimensional mapping and entrainment study.

Authors:  Yasuo Okumura; Ichiro Watanabe; Toshiko Nakai; Kimie Ohkubo; Tatsuya Kofune; Sonoko Ashino; Masayoshi Kofune; Koichi Nagashima; Atsushi Hirayama; Fumio Suzuki
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 1.900

10.  Identification of extremely slow conduction in the cavotricuspid isthmus during common atrial flutter ablation.

Authors:  Jian Chen; Christian de Chillou; Per Ivar Hoff; Ole Rossvoll; Marius Andronache; Nicolas Sadoul; Isabelle Magnin-Poull; Knut Ståle Erga; Etienne Aliot; Ole-Jørgen Ohm
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.900

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.