Literature DB >> 11332556

Electrogram polarity and cavotricuspid isthmus block during ablation of typical atrial flutter.

H Tada1, H Oral, C Sticherling, S P Chough, R L Baker, K Wasmer, M H Kim, F Pelosi, G F Michaud, B P Knight, S A Strickberger, F Morady.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The atrial activation sequence around the tricuspid annulus has been used to assess whether complete block has been achieved across the cavotricuspid isthmus during radiofrequency ablation of typical atrial flutter. However, sometimes the atrial activation sequence does not clearly establish the presence or absence of complete block. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a change in the polarity of atrial electrograms recorded near the ablation line is an accurate indicator of complete isthmus block. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Radiofrequency ablation was performed in 34 men and 10 women (age 60 +/- 13 years [mean +/- SD]) with isthmus-dependent, counterclockwise atrial flutter. Electrograms were recorded around the tricuspid annulus using a duodecapolar halo catheter. Electrograms recorded from two distal electrode pairs (E1 and E2) positioned just anterior to the ablation line were analyzed during atrial flutter and during coronary sinus pacing, before and after ablation. Complete isthmus block was verified by the presence of widely split double electrograms along the entire ablation line. Complete bidirectional isthmus block was achieved in 39 (89%) of 44 patients. Before ablation, the initial polarity of E1 and E2 was predominantly negative during atrial flutter and predominantly positive during coronary sinus pacing. During incomplete isthmus block, the electrogram polarity became reversed either only at E2, or at neither E1 nor E2. In every patient, the polarity of E1 and E2 became negative during coronary sinus pacing only after complete isthmus block was achieved. In 4 patients (10%), the atrial activation sequence recorded with the halo catheter was consistent with complete isthmus block, but the presence of incomplete block was accurately detected by inspection of the polarity of E1 and E2.
CONCLUSION: Reversal of polarity in bipolar electrograms recorded just anterior to the line of isthmus block during coronary sinus pacing after ablation of atrial flutter is a simple, quick, and accurate indicator of complete isthmus block.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11332556     DOI: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2001.00393.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  10 in total

1.  Double potential interval and transisthmus conduction time for prediction of cavotricuspid isthmus block after ablation of typical atrial flutter.

Authors:  Ching-Tai Tai; Azizul Haque; Yung-Kuo Lin; Hsuan-Ming Tsao; Yu-An Ding; Mau-Song Chang; Shih-Ann Chen
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Pace mapping in the atrium using bipolar electrograms from widely spaced electrodes.

Authors:  Raja J Selvaraj; Sreekanth Yerram; Pradeep Kumar; Santhosh Satheesh; Ajith Ananthakrishna Pillai; Mahesh Kumar Saktheeswaran; Jayaraman Balachander
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2015-03-20

3.  Usefulness of the polarity in high-density wide range-filtered bipolar mapping to detect isthmus block during radiofrequency ablation of typical atrial flutter.

Authors:  Yasuo Okumura; Ichiro Watanabe; Takeshi Yamada; Kimie Ohkubo; Kazunori Kawauchi; Sonoko Ashino; Yasuhiro Takagi; Hidezou Sugimura; Kenichi Hashimoto; Atsushi Shindo; Satoshi Saito
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  What is the best endpoint for ablating atrial flutter?

Authors:  D E Krummen; S M Narayan
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Right Ventricular Pacing for Assessment of Cavo-Tricuspid Isthmus Block.

Authors:  Ganesh Venkataraman; Marc Wish; Ted Friehling; S Adam Strickberger
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2016-08-31

6.  Assessment of the correlation between two defining criteria for bidirectional isthmic block in the ablation of typical atrial flutter.

Authors:  R Rosu; A Abdelaal; M Andronache; G Gusetu; L Muresan; Rp Martins; C Bondor; D Pop; A Malai; M Ilea; C Pop; D Dan; M Puschita; P Nanu; D Zdrenghea
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2011-02-07

7.  Randomized controlled trial of Amigo® robotically controlled versus manually controlled ablation of the cavo-tricuspid isthmus using a contact force ablation catheter.

Authors:  Kurt S Hoffmayer; Felix Krainski; Sanjay Shah; Jessica Hunter; Maylene Alegre; Jonathan C Hsu; Gregory K Feld
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 1.900

8.  Can right ventricular pacing be useful in the assessment of cavo-tricuspid isthumus block?

Authors:  Gennaro Miracapillo; Alessandro Costoli; Luigi Addonisio; Marco Breschi; Silva Severi
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2008-11-01

9.  Identification of extremely slow conduction in the cavotricuspid isthmus during common atrial flutter ablation.

Authors:  Jian Chen; Christian de Chillou; Per Ivar Hoff; Ole Rossvoll; Marius Andronache; Nicolas Sadoul; Isabelle Magnin-Poull; Knut Ståle Erga; Etienne Aliot; Ole-Jørgen Ohm
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.900

10.  Ablation of atrial flutter: block (isthmus conduction) or not a block, that is the question?

Authors:  Ashish Nabar
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2002-07-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.