Literature DB >> 12391398

Use of factorial designs to optimize animal experiments and reduce animal use.

Robert Shaw1, Michael F W Festing, Ian Peers, Larry Furlong.   

Abstract

Optimization of experiments, such as those used in drug discovery, can lead to useful savings of scientific resources. Factors such as sex, strain, and age of the animals and protocol-specific factors such as timing and methods of administering treatments can have an important influence on the response of animals to experimental treatments. Factorial experimental designs can be used to explore which factors and what levels of these factors will maximize the difference between a vehicle control and a known positive control treatment. This information can then be used to design more efficient experiments, either by reducing the numbers of animals used or by increasing the sensitivity so that smaller biological effects can be detected. A factorial experimental design approach is more effective and efficient than the older approach of varying one factor at a time. Two examples of real factorial experiments reveal how using this approach can potentially lead to a reduction in animal use and savings in financial and scientific resources without loss of scientific validity.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12391398     DOI: 10.1093/ilar.43.4.223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ILAR J        ISSN: 1084-2020


  16 in total

1.  Factors influencing preclinical in vivo evaluation of mumps vaccine strain immunogenicity.

Authors:  B Halassy; T Kurtović; M Brgles; M Lang Balija; D Forčić
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Laboratory animal science: a resource to improve the quality of science.

Authors:  M Forni
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.459

3.  Enhancing the ability of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis to serve as a more rigorous model of multiple sclerosis through refinement of the experimental design.

Authors:  Mitchell R Emerson; Ryan J Gallagher; Janet G Marquis; Steven M LeVine
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 0.982

4.  Ethics and animal numbers: informal analyses, uncertain sample sizes, inefficient replications, and type I errors.

Authors:  Douglas A Fitts
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.232

Review 5.  Sex bias in preclinical research and an exploration of how to change the status quo.

Authors:  Natasha A Karp; Neil Reavey
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 8.739

6.  Studying both sexes: a guiding principle for biomedicine.

Authors:  Janine Austin Clayton
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Design of experiments with multiple independent variables: a resource management perspective on complete and reduced factorial designs.

Authors:  Linda M Collins; John J Dziak; Runze Li
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2009-09

8.  Quality of interventional animal experiments in Chinese journals: compliance with ARRIVE guidelines.

Authors:  Bing Zhao; Yanbiao Jiang; Ting Zhang; Zhizhong Shang; Weiyi Zhang; Kaiyan Hu; Fei Chen; Fan Mei; Qianqian Gao; Li Zhao; Joey S W Kwong; Bin Ma
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 2.741

9.  Exposure to environmental stressors result in increased viral load and further reduction of production parameters in pigs experimentally infected with PCV2b.

Authors:  Robert Patterson; Amanda Nevel; Adriana V Diaz; Henny M Martineau; Theo Demmers; Christopher Browne; Bettina Mavrommatis; Dirk Werling
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  Survey of the quality of experimental design, statistical analysis and reporting of research using animals.

Authors:  Carol Kilkenny; Nick Parsons; Ed Kadyszewski; Michael F W Festing; Innes C Cuthill; Derek Fry; Jane Hutton; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.