Literature DB >> 26376015

Factors influencing preclinical in vivo evaluation of mumps vaccine strain immunogenicity.

B Halassy1,2, T Kurtović1,2, M Brgles1,2, M Lang Balija3, D Forčić1,2.   

Abstract

Immunogenicity testing in animals is a necessary preclinical assay for demonstration of vaccine efficacy the results of which are often the basis for the decision whether to proceed or withdraw the further development of the novel vaccine candidate. However, in vivo assays are rarely, if at all, optimized and validated. Here we clearly demonstrate the importance of in vivo assay (mumps virus immunogenicity testing in guinea pigs) optimization for gaining reliable results and the suitability of Fractional factorial design of experiments (DoE) for such a purpose. By the use of DoE with resolution IV (2IV((4-1))) we clearly revealed that the parameters significantly increasing assay sensitivity were interval between animal immunizations followed by the body weight of experimental animals. The quantity (0 versus 2%) of the stabilizer (fetal bovine serum, FBS) in the sample was shown as non-influencing parameter in DoE setup. However, the separate experiment investigating only the FBS influence, and performed under other parameters optimally set, showed that FBS also influences the results of immunogenicity assay. Such finding indicated that (a) factors with strong influence on the measured outcome can hide the effects of parameters with modest/low influence and (b) the matrix of mumps virus samples to be compared for immunogenicity must be identical for reliable virus immunogenicity comparison. Finally the 3 mumps vaccine strains widely used for decades in the licensed vaccines were for the first time compared in an animal model, and results obtained were in line with their reported immunogenicity in human population supporting the predictive power of the optimized in vivo assay.

Entities:  

Keywords:  design of Experiments (DoE); in vivo bioassay optimization; mumps virus; non-clinical vaccine immunogenicity assessment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26376015      PMCID: PMC4635857          DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2015.1062191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother        ISSN: 2164-5515            Impact factor:   3.452


  39 in total

1.  Comparative efficacy of three mumps vaccines during disease outbreak in Eastern Switzerland: cohort study.

Authors:  M Schlegel; J J Osterwalder; R L Galeazzi; P L Vernazza
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-08-07

2.  Neutralization activity and persistence of antibodies induced in response to vaccination with a novel mumps strain, RIT 4385.

Authors:  V Usonis; V Bakasenas; M Denis
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 3.  Vaccines: correlates of vaccine-induced immunity.

Authors:  Stanley A Plotkin
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  [Estimation of the efficacy of three strains of mumps vaccines during an epidemic of mumps in the Geneva canton (Switzerland)].

Authors:  E Chamot; L Toscani; P Egger; D Germann; C Bourquin
Journal:  Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 1.019

5.  Strategies for the optimisation of in vivo experiments in accordance with the 3Rs philosophy.

Authors:  Judith C Madden; Mark Hewitt; Katarzyna Przybylak; Rob J Vandebriel; Aldert H Piersma; Mark T D Cronin
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 3.271

6.  Rates of spontaneous mutation among RNA viruses.

Authors:  J W Drake
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-05-01       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Molecular epidemiological evaluation of the recent resurgence in mumps virus infections in Ireland.

Authors:  Michael J Carr; Eibhlín Moss; Allison Waters; Jonathan Dean; Li Jin; Suzie Coughlan; Jeff Connell; William W Hall; Jaythoon Hassan
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Investigation of a mumps outbreak among university students with two measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccinations, Virginia, September-December 2006.

Authors:  J S Rota; J C Turner; M K Yost-Daljev; M Freeman; D M Toney; E Meisel; N Williams; S B Sowers; L Lowe; P A Rota; L A Nicolai; L Peake; W J Bellini
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.327

9.  Recent resurgence of mumps in the United States.

Authors:  Gustavo H Dayan; M Patricia Quinlisk; Amy A Parker; Albert E Barskey; Meghan L Harris; Jennifer M Hill Schwartz; Kae Hunt; Carol G Finley; Dennis P Leschinsky; Anne L O'Keefe; Joshua Clayton; Lon K Kightlinger; Eden G Dietle; Jeffrey Berg; Cynthia L Kenyon; Susan T Goldstein; Shannon K Stokley; Susan B Redd; Paul A Rota; Jennifer Rota; Daoling Bi; Sandra W Roush; Carolyn B Bridges; Tammy A Santibanez; Umesh Parashar; William J Bellini; Jane F Seward
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Antigenic differences between vaccine and circulating wild-type mumps viruses decreases neutralization capacity of vaccine-induced antibodies.

Authors:  M Šantak; M Lang-Balija; J Ivancic-Jelecki; T Košutić-Gulija; S Ljubin-Sternak; D Forcic
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 4.434

View more
  1 in total

1.  Is Better Standardization of Therapeutic Antibody Quality in Emerging Diseases Epidemics Possible?

Authors:  Sanda Ravlić; Ana Hećimović; Tihana Kurtović; Jelena Ivančić Jelečki; Dubravko Forčić; Anamarija Slović; Ivan Christian Kurolt; Željka Mačak Šafranko; Tatjana Mušlin; Dina Rnjak; Ozren Jakšić; Ena Sorić; Gorana Džepina; Oktavija Đaković Rode; Kristina Kujavec Šljivac; Tomislav Vuk; Irena Jukić; Alemka Markotić; Beata Halassy
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 7.561

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.