Literature DB >> 12386342

A test of evolutionary theories of aging.

Kimberly A Hughes1, Julie A Alipaz, Jenny M Drnevich, Rose M Reynolds.   

Abstract

Senescence is a nearly universal feature of multicellular organisms, and understanding why it occurs is a long-standing problem in biology. The two leading theories posit that aging is due to (i) pleiotropic genes with beneficial early-life effects but deleterious late-life effects ("antagonistic pleiotropy") or (ii) mutations with purely deleterious late-life effects ("mutation accumulation"). Previous attempts to distinguish these theories have been inconclusive because of a lack of unambiguous, contrasting predictions. We conducted experiments with Drosophila based on recent population-genetic models that yield contrasting predictions. Genetic variation and inbreeding effects increased dramatically with age, as predicted by the mutation theory. This increase occurs because genes with deleterious effects with a late age of onset are unopposed by natural selection. Our findings provide the strongest support yet for the mutation theory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12386342      PMCID: PMC137876          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.222326199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  34 in total

1.  A mutant Drosophila insulin receptor homolog that extends life-span and impairs neuroendocrine function.

Authors:  M Tatar; A Kopelman; D Epstein; M P Tu; C M Yin; R S Garofalo
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-04-06       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Evolutionary theories of ageing applied to long-lived organisms.

Authors:  L Partridge
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.032

3.  Heterogeneity in Individual Mortality Risk and Its Importance for Evolutionary Studies of Senescence.

Authors:  Philip M Service
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 4.  Genetic pathways that regulate ageing in model organisms.

Authors:  L Guarente; C Kenyon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-11-09       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Why do we age?

Authors:  T B Kirkwood; S N Austad
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-11-09       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  The influence of environmentally induced heterogeneity on age-specific genetic variance for mortality rates.

Authors:  S D Pletcher; J W Curtsinger
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.588

7.  Patterns of age-specific means and genetic variances of mortality rates predicted by the mutation-accumulation theory of ageing.

Authors:  B Charlesworth
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2001-05-07       Impact factor: 2.691

8.  Toward reconciling inferences concerning genetic variation in senescence in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  F H Shaw; D E Promislow; M Tatar; K A Hughes; C J Geyer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Extension of life-span by loss of CHICO, a Drosophila insulin receptor substrate protein.

Authors:  D J Clancy; D Gems; L G Harshman; S Oldham; H Stocker; E Hafen; S J Leevers; L Partridge
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-04-06       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Extended life-span conferred by cotransporter gene mutations in Drosophila.

Authors:  B Rogina; R A Reenan; S P Nilsen; S L Helfand
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  35 in total

1.  Evolutionary demography and quantitative genetics: age-specific survival as a threshold trait.

Authors:  Jacob A Moorad; Daniel E L Promislow
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Mutation and the evolution of ageing: from biometrics to system genetics.

Authors:  Kimberly A Hughes
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Synergistic Pleiotropy Overrides the Costs of Complexity in Viral Adaptation.

Authors:  Lindsey W McGee; Andrew M Sackman; Anneliese J Morrison; Jessica Pierce; Jeremy Anisman; Darin R Rokyta
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Quantitative trait loci with age-specific effects on fecundity in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Jeff Leips; Paul Gilligan; Trudy F C Mackay
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-11-04       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Segregating variation in the transcriptome: cis regulation and additivity of effects.

Authors:  Kimberly A Hughes; Julien F Ayroles; Melissa M Reedy; Jenny M Drnevich; Kevin C Rowe; Elizabeth A Ruedi; Carla E Cáceres; Ken N Paige
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Age specificity of inbreeding load in Drosophila melanogaster and implications for the evolution of late-life mortality plateaus.

Authors:  Rose M Reynolds; Sara Temiyasathit; Melissa M Reedy; Elizabeth A Ruedi; Jenny M Drnevich; Jeff Leips; Kimberly A Hughes
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-07-29       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Inbreeding depression and male survivorship in Drosophila: implications for senescence theory.

Authors:  William R Swindell; Juan L Bouzat
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Dominance genetic variance for traits under directional selection in Drosophila serrata.

Authors:  Jacqueline L Sztepanacz; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Significance of cellular senescence in aging and cancer.

Authors:  Angela Grimes; Sathees B C Chandra
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 4.679

10.  Age, but not experience, affects courtship gene expression in male Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Ruedi; Kimberly A Hughes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.