Toward reconciling inferences concerning genetic variation in senescence in Drosophila melanogaster.

Standard models for senescence predict an increase in the additive genetic variance for log mortality rate late in the life cycle. Variance component analysis of age-specific mortality rates of related cohorts is problematic. The actual mortality rates are not observable and can be estimated only crudely at early ages when few individuals are dying and at late ages when most are dead. Therefore, standard quantitative genetic analysis techniques cannot be applied with confidence. We present a novel and rigorous analysis that treats the mortality rates as missing data following two different parametric senescence models. Two recent studies of Drosophila melanogaster, the original analyses of which reached different conclusions, are reanalyzed here. The two-parameter Gompertz model assumes that mortality rates increase exponentially with age. A related but more complex three-parameter logistic model allows for subsequent leveling off in mortality rates at late ages. We find that while additive variance for mortality rates increases for late ages under the Gompertz model, it declines under the logistic model. The results from the two studies are similar, with differences attributable to differences between the experiments.