Literature DB >> 12384568

Does RNA polymerase help drive chromosome segregation in bacteria?

Jonathan Dworkin1, Richard Losick.   

Abstract

In contrast to eukaryotic cells, bacteria segregate their chromosomes without a conspicuous mitotic apparatus. Replication of bacterial chromosomes initiates bidirectionally from a single site (oriC), and visualization of the region of the chromosome containing oriC in living cells reveals that origins rapidly move apart toward opposite poles of the cell during the cell cycle. The motor that drives this poleward movement is unknown. An attractive candidate is RNA polymerase, which is a powerful and abundant molecular motor. If, as has been suggested for other macromolecular complexes, the movement of RNA polymerase is restricted in the cell, then transcription would translocate the DNA template, thereby providing the motive force to separate replicating chromosomes. A coordinated effect of many transcribing RNA polymerases could result from the widely conserved global bias of gene orientation away from oriC. By using fluorescence microscopy of living Bacillus subtilis cells, we demonstrate that an inhibitor of RNA polymerase acts to inhibit separation of newly duplicated DNAs near the origin of replication. We propose that the force exerted by RNA polymerase contributes to chromosome movement in bacteria, and that this force, coupled with the biased orientation of transcription units, helps to drive chromosome segregation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12384568      PMCID: PMC137841          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.182539899

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  37 in total

1.  Composition strand asymmetries in prokaryotic genomes: mutational bias and biased gene orientation.

Authors:  P Lopez; H Philippe
Journal:  C R Acad Sci III       Date:  2001-03

2.  Replisome assembly at oriC, the replication origin of E. coli, reveals an explanation for initiation sites outside an origin.

Authors:  L Fang; M J Davey; M O'Donnell
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 17.970

3.  Suppression of chromosome segregation defects of Escherichia coli muk mutants by mutations in topoisomerase I.

Authors:  J A Sawitzke; S Austin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  DNA transport in bacteria.

Authors:  J Errington; J Bath; L J Wu
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 5.  An analysis of the factory model for chromosome replication and segregation in bacteria.

Authors:  J Sawitzke; S Austin
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.501

Review 6.  Dynamic localization of bacterial and plasmid chromosomes.

Authors:  S Hiraga
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 16.830

7.  Dynamic organization of chromosomal DNA in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  H Niki; Y Yamaichi; S Hiraga
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-01-15       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  Movement of replicating DNA through a stationary replisome.

Authors:  K P Lemon; A D Grossman
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 17.970

9.  Bacillus subtilis SMC is required for proper arrangement of the chromosome and for efficient segregation of replication termini but not for bipolar movement of newly duplicated origin regions.

Authors:  P L Graumann
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  The Caulobacter crescentus smc gene is required for cell cycle progression and chromosome segregation.

Authors:  R B Jensen; L Shapiro
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-09-14       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  46 in total

1.  Dysfunctional MreB inhibits chromosome segregation in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Thomas Kruse; Jakob Møller-Jensen; Anders Løbner-Olesen; Kenn Gerdes
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 2.  Chromosome segregation in Eubacteria.

Authors:  Kit Pogliano; Joe Pogliano; Eric Becker
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.934

3.  Rapid and sequential movement of individual chromosomal loci to specific subcellular locations during bacterial DNA replication.

Authors:  Patrick H Viollier; Martin Thanbichler; Patrick T McGrath; Lisandra West; Maliwan Meewan; Harley H McAdams; Lucy Shapiro
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-06-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Cell cycle coordination and regulation of bacterial chromosome segregation dynamics by polarly localized proteins.

Authors:  Whitman B Schofield; Hoong Chuin Lim; Christine Jacobs-Wagner
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  Caulobacter chromosome segregation is an ordered multistep process.

Authors:  Conrad W Shebelut; Jonathan M Guberman; Sven van Teeffelen; Anastasiya A Yakhnina; Zemer Gitai
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Independent segregation of the two arms of the Escherichia coli ori region requires neither RNA synthesis nor MreB dynamics.

Authors:  Xindan Wang; David J Sherratt
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 7.  Organization of supercoil domains and their reorganization by transcription.

Authors:  Shuang Deng; Richard A Stein; N Patrick Higgins
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.501

8.  Dancing around the divisome: asymmetric chromosome segregation in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Xindan Wang; Christophe Possoz; David J Sherratt
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 9.  Diversity and redundancy in bacterial chromosome segregation mechanisms.

Authors:  Jeff Errington; Heath Murray; Ling Juan Wu
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 10.  Chromatin architecture and gene expression in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Hanni Willenbrock; David W Ussery
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 13.583

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.