Literature DB >> 20660743

Caulobacter chromosome segregation is an ordered multistep process.

Conrad W Shebelut1, Jonathan M Guberman, Sven van Teeffelen, Anastasiya A Yakhnina, Zemer Gitai.   

Abstract

Despite its fundamental nature, bacterial chromosome segregation remains poorly understood. Viewing segregation as a single process caused multiple proposed mechanisms to appear in conflict and failed to explain how asymmetrically dividing bacteria break symmetry to move only one of their chromosomes. Here, we demonstrate that the ParA ATPase extends from one cell pole and pulls the chromosome by retracting upon association with the ParB DNA-binding protein. Surprisingly, ParA disruption has a specific effect on chromosome segregation that only perturbs the latter stages of this process. Using quantitative high-resolution imaging, we demonstrate that this specificity results from the multistep nature of chromosome translocation. We propose that Caulobacter chromosome segregation follows an ordered pathway of events with distinct functions and mechanisms. Initiation releases polar tethering of the origin of replication, distinction spatially differentiates the two chromosomes, and commitment irreversibly translocates the distal centromeric locus. Thus, much as eukaryotic mitosis involves a sequence of distinct subprocesses, Caulobacter cells also segregate their chromosomes through an orchestrated series of steps. We discuss how the multistep view of bacterial chromosome segregation can help to explain and reconcile outstanding puzzles and frame future investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20660743      PMCID: PMC2922572          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1005274107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  26 in total

1.  Rapid and sequential movement of individual chromosomal loci to specific subcellular locations during bacterial DNA replication.

Authors:  Patrick H Viollier; Martin Thanbichler; Patrick T McGrath; Lisandra West; Maliwan Meewan; Harley H McAdams; Lucy Shapiro
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-06-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Growth conditions regulate the requirements for Caulobacter chromosome segregation.

Authors:  Conrad W Shebelut; Rasmus B Jensen; Zemer Gitai
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 3.  Escherichia coli and its chromosome.

Authors:  Rodrigo Reyes-Lamothe; Xindan Wang; David Sherratt
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2008-04-09       Impact factor: 17.079

4.  A self-associating protein critical for chromosome attachment, division, and polar organization in caulobacter.

Authors:  Gitte Ebersbach; Ariane Briegel; Grant J Jensen; Christine Jacobs-Wagner
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Movement of replicating DNA through a stationary replisome.

Authors:  K P Lemon; A D Grossman
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 17.970

6.  Entropy-driven spatial organization of highly confined polymers: lessons for the bacterial chromosome.

Authors:  Suckjoon Jun; Bela Mulder
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-08-02       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Caulobacter PopZ forms a polar subdomain dictating sequential changes in pole composition and function.

Authors:  Grant R Bowman; Luis R Comolli; Guido M Gaietta; Michael Fero; Sun-Hae Hong; Ying Jones; Julie H Lee; Kenneth H Downing; Mark H Ellisman; Harley H McAdams; Lucy Shapiro
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.501

8.  Cell cycle-dependent polar localization of chromosome partitioning proteins in Caulobacter crescentus.

Authors:  D A Mohl; J W Gober
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1997-03-07       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Caulobacter requires a dedicated mechanism to initiate chromosome segregation.

Authors:  Esteban Toro; Sun-Hae Hong; Harley H McAdams; Lucy Shapiro
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-29       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Recruitment of condensin to replication origin regions by ParB/SpoOJ promotes chromosome segregation in B. subtilis.

Authors:  Stephan Gruber; Jeff Errington
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  65 in total

1.  A polarity factor takes the lead in chromosome segregation.

Authors:  Clare L Kirkpatrick; Patrick H Viollier
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 2.  Chromosome dynamics in multichromosome bacteria.

Authors:  Jyoti K Jha; Jong Hwan Baek; Tatiana Venkova-Canova; Dhruba K Chattoraj
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2012-01-28

3.  Escherichia coli sister chromosome separation includes an abrupt global transition with concomitant release of late-splitting intersister snaps.

Authors:  Mohan C Joshi; Aude Bourniquel; Jay Fisher; Brian T Ho; David Magnan; Nancy Kleckner; David Bates
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  How do bacteria localize proteins to the cell pole?

Authors:  Géraldine Laloux; Christine Jacobs-Wagner
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 5.285

5.  Evidence for a DNA-relay mechanism in ParABS-mediated chromosome segregation.

Authors:  Hoong Chuin Lim; Ivan Vladimirovich Surovtsev; Bruno Gabriel Beltran; Fang Huang; Jörg Bewersdorf; Christine Jacobs-Wagner
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Replication initiator DnaA binds at the Caulobacter centromere and enables chromosome segregation.

Authors:  Paola E Mera; Virginia S Kalogeraki; Lucy Shapiro
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  XerD unloads bacterial SMC complexes at the replication terminus.

Authors:  Xheni Karaboja; Zhongqing Ren; Hugo B Brandão; Payel Paul; David Z Rudner; Xindan Wang
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 17.970

8.  DNA-relay mechanism is sufficient to explain ParA-dependent intracellular transport and patterning of single and multiple cargos.

Authors:  Ivan V Surovtsev; Manuel Campos; Christine Jacobs-Wagner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Physical modeling of chromosome segregation in escherichia coli reveals impact of force and DNA relaxation.

Authors:  Thomas J Lampo; Nathan J Kuwada; Paul A Wiggins; Andrew J Spakowitz
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Bacterial scaffold directs pole-specific centromere segregation.

Authors:  Jerod L Ptacin; Andreas Gahlmann; Grant R Bowman; Adam M Perez; Lexy von Diezmann; Michael R Eckart; W E Moerner; Lucy Shapiro
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.