Kelly A Metcalfe1, Steven A Narod. 1. The Centre for Research in Women's Health, Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prophylactic bilateral mastectomy is a preventive option for women who are at high risk of developing breast cancer. We compared the perceptions of breast cancer risk among women who had previously undergone prophylactic bilateral mastectomy with objective estimates of their breast cancer risk. METHODS: We asked 75 women in the Canadian province of Ontario who had undergone prophylactic bilateral mastectomy between 1991 and 2000 to provide a complete family history of the cancers that had occurred by the time of their surgery and to indicate their BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation status. This information was used to generate estimates of each woman's risk for breast cancer by using the Gail model, the Claus model, and the BRCAPRO model. Sixty of the women also provided their own estimates of their lifetime risks of developing breast cancer before and after they had prophylactic mastectomy. Risk estimates were compared using Wilcoxon's signed-rank test and Pearson's product-moment correlation analysis. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: The women estimated that their lifetime risk of developing breast cancer before surgery was, on average, 76% (range = 20%-100%) and after surgery was 11.4% (range = 0%-60%). The mean estimated absolute risk reduction the women attributed to prophylactic mastectomy was 64.8%. The average computer-generated risk estimates were 59% for the 14 women who reported that they carried a BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutation and 17% for the other women (of whom 43 had a strong family history of breast cancer and 18 had a limited family history). Breast cancer risk was statistically significantly overestimated by all women except for the known BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers. CONCLUSION: Women who undergo prophylactic bilateral mastectomy have an exaggerated perception of their breast cancer risk before surgery. Formal genetic counseling and genetic testing may result in more accurate risk perceptions to guide women in choosing other preventive options.
BACKGROUND: Prophylactic bilateral mastectomy is a preventive option for women who are at high risk of developing breast cancer. We compared the perceptions of breast cancer risk among women who had previously undergone prophylactic bilateral mastectomy with objective estimates of their breast cancer risk. METHODS: We asked 75 women in the Canadian province of Ontario who had undergone prophylactic bilateral mastectomy between 1991 and 2000 to provide a complete family history of the cancers that had occurred by the time of their surgery and to indicate their BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation status. This information was used to generate estimates of each woman's risk for breast cancer by using the Gail model, the Claus model, and the BRCAPRO model. Sixty of the women also provided their own estimates of their lifetime risks of developing breast cancer before and after they had prophylactic mastectomy. Risk estimates were compared using Wilcoxon's signed-rank test and Pearson's product-moment correlation analysis. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: The women estimated that their lifetime risk of developing breast cancer before surgery was, on average, 76% (range = 20%-100%) and after surgery was 11.4% (range = 0%-60%). The mean estimated absolute risk reduction the women attributed to prophylactic mastectomy was 64.8%. The average computer-generated risk estimates were 59% for the 14 women who reported that they carried a BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutation and 17% for the other women (of whom 43 had a strong family history of breast cancer and 18 had a limited family history). Breast cancer risk was statistically significantly overestimated by all women except for the known BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers. CONCLUSION:Women who undergo prophylactic bilateral mastectomy have an exaggerated perception of their breast cancer risk before surgery. Formal genetic counseling and genetic testing may result in more accurate risk perceptions to guide women in choosing other preventive options.
Authors: Kelly A Metcalfe; Daphna Birenbaum-Carmeli; Jan Lubinski; Jacek Gronwald; Henry Lynch; Pal Moller; Parviz Ghadirian; William D Foulkes; Jan Klijn; Eitan Friedman; Charmaine Kim-Sing; Peter Ainsworth; Barry Rosen; Susan Domchek; Teresa Wagner; Nadine Tung; Siranoush Manoukian; Fergus Couch; Ping Sun; Steven A Narod Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2008-05-01 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Glen B Taksler; Elisabeth F P Peterse; Isarah Willems; Kevin Ten Haaf; Erik E L Jansen; Inge M C M de Kok; Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; Harry J de Koning; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 31.777