Literature DB >> 12381308

Sequence variations within protein families are linearly related to structural variations.

Patrice Koehl1, Michael Levitt.   

Abstract

It is commonly believed that similarities between the sequences of two proteins infer similarities between their structures. Sequence alignments reliably recognize pairs of protein of similar structures provided that the percentage sequence identity between their two sequences is sufficiently high. This distinction, however, is statistically less reliable when the percentage sequence identity is lower than 30% and little is known then about the detailed relationship between the two measures of similarity. Here, we investigate the inverse correlation between structural similarity and sequence similarity on 12 protein structure families. We define the structure similarity between two proteins as the cRMS distance between their structures. The sequence similarity for a pair of proteins is measured as the mean distance between the sequences in the subsets of sequence space compatible with their structures. We obtain an approximation of the sequence space compatible with a protein by designing a collection of protein sequences both stable and specific to the structure of that protein. Using these measures of sequence and structure similarities, we find that structural changes within a protein family are linearly related to changes in sequence similarity.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12381308      PMCID: PMC2692051          DOI: 10.1016/s0022-2836(02)00971-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  38 in total

1.  Evolution of protein sequences and structures.

Authors:  T C Wood; W R Pearson
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-08-27       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Twilight zone of protein sequence alignments.

Authors:  B Rost
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  1999-02

3.  Comprehensive assessment of automatic structural alignment against a manual standard, the scop classification of proteins.

Authors:  M Gerstein; M Levitt
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Assessing sequence comparison methods with reliable structurally identified distant evolutionary relationships.

Authors:  S E Brenner; C Chothia; T J Hubbard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-05-26       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Recognition of analogous and homologous protein folds: analysis of sequence and structure conservation.

Authors:  R B Russell; M A Saqi; R A Sayle; P A Bates; M J Sternberg
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1997-06-13       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 6.  A structural explanation for the twilight zone of protein sequence homology.

Authors:  S Y Chung; S Subbiah
Journal:  Structure       Date:  1996-10-15       Impact factor: 5.006

7.  De novo protein design. II. Plasticity in sequence space.

Authors:  P Koehl; M Levitt
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-11-12       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Two crystal structures of the B1 immunoglobulin-binding domain of streptococcal protein G and comparison with NMR.

Authors:  T Gallagher; P Alexander; P Bryan; G L Gilliland
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1994-04-19       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Comparison of conformational characteristics in structurally similar protein pairs.

Authors:  T P Flores; C A Orengo; D S Moss; J M Thornton
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  A new approach to the design of stable proteins.

Authors:  E I Shakhnovich; A M Gutin
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  1993-11
View more
  15 in total

1.  Analysis of protein homology by assessing the (dis)similarity in protein loop regions.

Authors:  Anna R Panchenko; Thomas Madej
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-11-15

2.  LEON: multiple aLignment Evaluation Of Neighbours.

Authors:  Julie D Thompson; Véronique Prigent; Olivier Poch
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-02-24       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Evolutionary plasticity of protein families: coupling between sequence and structure variation.

Authors:  Anna R Panchenko; Yuri I Wolf; Larisa A Panchenko; Thomas Madej
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2005-11-15

4.  Evolutionary constraints on structural similarity in orthologs and paralogs.

Authors:  Mark E Peterson; Feng Chen; Jeffery G Saven; David S Roos; Patricia C Babbitt; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Update of TTD: Therapeutic Target Database.

Authors:  Feng Zhu; BuCong Han; Pankaj Kumar; XiangHui Liu; XiaoHua Ma; Xiaona Wei; Lu Huang; YangFan Guo; LianYi Han; ChanJuan Zheng; YuZong Chen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  BAYESIAN PROTEIN STRUCTURE ALIGNMENT.

Authors:  Abel Rodriguez; Scott C Schmidler
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 2.083

7.  Homology modeling in a dynamical world.

Authors:  Alexander Miguel Monzon; Diego Javier Zea; Cristina Marino-Buslje; Gustavo Parisi
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  Of bits and bugs--on the use of bioinformatics and a bacterial crystal structure to solve a eukaryotic repeat-protein structure.

Authors:  Almut Graebsch; Stéphane Roche; Dirk Kostrewa; Johannes Söding; Dierk Niessing
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The combined effects of amino acid substitutions and indels on the evolution of structure within protein families.

Authors:  Zheng Zhang; Yuxiao Wang; Lushan Wang; Peiji Gao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The selection of acceptable protein mutations.

Authors:  Rajkumar Sasidharan; Cyrus Chothia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-31       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.