Literature DB >> 15382231

Analysis of protein homology by assessing the (dis)similarity in protein loop regions.

Anna R Panchenko1, Thomas Madej.   

Abstract

Two proteins are considered to have a similar fold if sufficiently many of their secondary structure elements are positioned similarly in space and are connected in the same order. Such a common structural scaffold may arise due to either divergent or convergent evolution. The intervening unaligned regions ("loops") between the superimposable helices and strands can exhibit a wide range of similarity and may offer clues to the structural evolution of folds. One might argue that more closely related proteins differ less in their nonconserved loop regions than distantly related proteins and, at the same time, the degree of variability in the loop regions in structurally similar but unrelated proteins is higher than in homologs. Here we introduce a new measure for structural (dis)similarity in loop regions that is based on the concept of the Hausdorff metric. This measure is used to gauge protein relatedness and is tested on a benchmark of homologous and analogous protein structures. It has been shown that the new measure can distinguish homologous from analogous proteins with the same or higher accuracy than the conventional measures that are based on comparing proteins in structurally aligned regions. We argue that this result can be attributed to the higher sensitivity of the Hausdorff (dis)similarity measure in detecting particularly evident dissimilarities in structures and draw some conclusions about evolutionary relatedness of proteins in the most populated protein folds. (c) 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15382231      PMCID: PMC1994810          DOI: 10.1002/prot.20237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  41 in total

1.  Sequence variations within protein families are linearly related to structural variations.

Authors:  Patrice Koehl; Michael Levitt
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-10-25       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Gaps in structurally similar proteins: towards improvement of multiple sequence alignment.

Authors:  James O Wrabl; Nick V Grishin
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-01-01

Review 3.  OB-fold domains: a snapshot of the evolution of sequence, structure and function.

Authors:  Vickery Arcus
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.809

4.  Rapid evolution in conformational space: a study of loop regions in a ubiquitous GTP binding domain.

Authors:  Christian Blouin; Davin Butt; Andrew James Roger
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 5.  Why do globular proteins fit the limited set of folding patterns?

Authors:  A V Finkelstein; O B Ptitsyn
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.667

6.  Gene duplications in the structural evolution of chymotrypsin.

Authors:  A D McLachlan
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1979-02-15       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 7.  Similarities of protein topologies: evolutionary divergence, functional convergence or principles of folding?

Authors:  O B Ptitsyn; A V Finkelstein
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 5.318

8.  On the prediction of protein structure: The significance of the root-mean-square deviation.

Authors:  F E Cohen; M J Sternberg
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 9.  Short-chain dehydrogenases/reductases (SDR): the 2002 update.

Authors:  Udo Oppermann; Charlotta Filling; Malin Hult; Naeem Shafqat; Xiaoqiu Wu; Monica Lindh; Jawed Shafqat; Erik Nordling; Yvonne Kallberg; Bengt Persson; Hans Jörnvall
Journal:  Chem Biol Interact       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 5.192

10.  The relation between the divergence of sequence and structure in proteins.

Authors:  C Chothia; A M Lesk
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  15 in total

1.  Evolutionary plasticity of protein families: coupling between sequence and structure variation.

Authors:  Anna R Panchenko; Yuri I Wolf; Larisa A Panchenko; Thomas Madej
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2005-11-15

Review 2.  New metrics for comparative genomics.

Authors:  Michael Y Galperin; Eugene Kolker
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 9.740

3.  Discrimination between distant homologs and structural analogs: lessons from manually constructed, reliable data sets.

Authors:  Hua Cheng; Bong-Hyun Kim; Nick V Grishin
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2008-01-05       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Analysis of loop boundaries using different local structure assignment methods.

Authors:  Manoj Tyagi; Aurélie Bornot; Bernard Offmann; Alexandre G de Brevern
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Functional states of homooligomers: insights from the evolution of glycosyltransferases.

Authors:  Kosuke Hashimoto; Thomas Madej; Stephen H Bryant; Anna R Panchenko
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Mining protein loops using a structural alphabet and statistical exceptionality.

Authors:  Leslie Regad; Juliette Martin; Gregory Nuel; Anne-Claude Camproux
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Coevolution in defining the functional specificity.

Authors:  Saikat Chakrabarti; Anna R Panchenko
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009-04

8.  Characteristics of Epstein-Barr virus envelope protein gp42.

Authors:  Pamela L Shaw; Austin N Kirschner; Theodore S Jardetzky; Richard Longnecker
Journal:  Virus Genes       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 2.332

9.  Protein homologous cores and loops: important clues to evolutionary relationships between structurally similar proteins.

Authors:  Thomas Madej; Anna R Panchenko; Jie Chen; Stephen H Bryant
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2007-04-10

10.  Insertions and the emergence of novel protein structure: a structure-based phylogenetic study of insertions.

Authors:  Haiyan Jiang; Christian Blouin
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.