Literature DB >> 12381060

Phoneme recognition and confusions with multichannel cochlear implants: consonants.

Taina T Välimaa1, Taisto K Määttä, Heikki J Löppönen, Martti J Sorri.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate how postlingually severely or profoundly hearing-impaired adults relearn to recognize consonants after receiving multichannel cochlear implants. Consonant recognition of 19 Finnish-speaking subjects was studied for a minimum of 6 months and a maximum of 24 months using an open-set nonsense-syllable test in a prospective repeated-measure design. Responses were coded for phoneme errors, and proportions of correct responses and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for recognition and confusions. Two years after the switch-on, the mean recognition of consonants was 71% (95% confidence interval = 68-73%). The manner of articulation was easier to classify than the place of articulation, and the consonants [s], [r], [k], [t], [p], [n], and [j] were easier to recognize than [h], [m], [l], and [v]. Adaptation to electrical hearing with a multichannel cochlear implant was successful, but consonants with alveolar, palatal, or velar transitions (high F2) were better recognized than consonants with labial transitions (low F2). The locus of the F2 transitions of the consonants with better recognition was at the frequencies 1.5-2 kHz, whereas the locus of the F2 transitions of the consonants with poorer recognition was at 1.2-1.4 kHz. A tendency to confuse consonants with the closest consonant with higher F2 transition was also noted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12381060     DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2002/085)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  7 in total

1.  Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) and Spatial Hearing Questionnaire (SHQ) Changes Over Time in Adults With Simultaneous Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Juan Zhang; Richard Tyler; Haihong Ji; Camille Dunn; Ningyu Wang; Marlan Hansen; Bruce Gantz
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.493

2.  Speech Rate Normalization and Phonemic Boundary Perception in Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Brittany N Jaekel; Rochelle S Newman; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Neural mechanisms supporting robust discrimination of spectrally and temporally degraded speech.

Authors:  Kamalini G Ranasinghe; William A Vrana; Chanel J Matney; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-05-02

4.  The Auditory Perception of Consonant Contrasts in Cochlear Implant Children.

Authors:  Mahnaz Eshaghi; Akbar Darouie; Robab Teymouri
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-11-04

5.  Performance over time on adults with simultaneous bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Son-A Chang; Richard S Tyler; Camille C Dunn; Haihong Ji; Shelley A Witt; Bruce Gantz; Marlan Hansen
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.664

6.  Influence of Protective Face Coverings on the Speech Recognition of Cochlear Implant Patients.

Authors:  Teresa G Vos; Margaret T Dillon; Emily Buss; Meredith A Rooth; Andrea L Bucker; Sarah Dillon; Adrienne Pearson; Kristen Quinones; Margaret E Richter; Noelle Roth; Allison Young; Matthew M Dedmon
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 2.970

7.  Home-Based Speech Perception Monitoring for Clinical Use With Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Astrid van Wieringen; Sara Magits; Tom Francart; Jan Wouters
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 4.677

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.