Literature DB >> 12381048

Predicting longitudinal change in language production and comprehension in individuals with Down syndrome: hierarchical linear modeling.

Robin S Chapman1, Linda J Hesketh, Doris J Kistler.   

Abstract

Longitudinal change in syntax comprehension and production skill, measured four times across a 6-year period, was modeled in 31 individuals with Down syndrome who were between the ages of 5 and 20 years at the start of the study. Hierarchical Linear Modeling was used to fit individual linear growth curves to the measures of syntax comprehension (TACL-R) and mean length of spontaneous utterances obtained in 12-min narrative tasks (MLU-S), yielding two parameters for each participant's comprehension and production: performance at study start and growth trajectory. Predictor variables were obtained by fitting linear growth curves to each individual's concurrent measures of nonverbal visual cognition (Pattern Analysis subtest of the Stanford-Binet), visual short-term memory (Bead Memory subtest), and auditory short-term memory (digit span), yielding two individual predictor parameters for each measure: performance at study start and growth trajectory. Chronological age at study start (grand-mean centered), sex, and hearing status were also taken as predictors. The best-fitting HLM model of the comprehension parameters uses age at study start, visual short-term memory, and auditory short-term memory as predictors of initial status and age at study start as a predictor of growth trajectory. The model accounted for 90% of the variance in intercept parameters, 79% of the variance in slope parameters, and 24% of the variance at level 1. The some predictors were significant predictors of initial status in the best model for production, with no measures predicting slope. The model accounted for 81% of the intercept variance and 43% of the level 1 variance. When comprehension parameters are added to the predictor set, the best model, accounting for 94% of the intercept and 22% of the slope variance, uses only comprehension at study start as a predictor of initial status and comprehension slope as a predictor of production slope. These results reflect the fact that expressive language acquisition continues in adolescence and is predicted by syntax comprehension and its growth trajectory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12381048     DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2002/073)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  23 in total

1.  Language Characteristics of Individuals with Down Syndrome.

Authors:  Gary E Martin; Jessica Klusek; Bruno Estigarribia; Joanne E Roberts
Journal:  Top Lang Disord       Date:  2009-04

2.  Expressive language profiles of verbally expressive adolescents and young adults with Down syndrome or fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Lizbeth H Finestack; Leonard Abbeduto
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Study on the social adaptation of Chinese children with down syndrome.

Authors:  Yan-Xia Wang; Shan-Shan Mao; Chun-Hong Xie; Yu-Feng Qin; Zhi-Wei Zhu; Jian-Ying Zhan; Jie Shao; Rong Li; Zheng-Yan Zhao
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2007-06-30       Impact factor: 2.759

4.  A multilevel modeling approach to examining individual differences in skill acquisition for a computer-based task.

Authors:  Sankaran N Nair; Sara J Czaja; Joseph Sharit
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.077

5.  Longitudinal profiles of expressive vocabulary, syntax and pragmatic language in boys with fragile X syndrome or Down syndrome.

Authors:  Gary E Martin; Molly Losh; Bruno Estigarribia; John Sideris; Joanne Roberts
Journal:  Int J Lang Commun Disord       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 3.020

6.  Syntactic comprehension and working memory in children with specific language impairment, autism or Down syndrome.

Authors:  Talita Fortunato-Tavares; Claudia R F Andrade; Debora Befi-Lopes; Suelly O Limongi; Fernanda D M Fernandes; Richard G Schwartz
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 1.346

7.  Cognitive, environmental, and linguistic predictors of syntax in fragile X syndrome and Down syndrome.

Authors:  Bruno Estigarribia; Gary E Martin; Joanne E Roberts
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Effects of dose frequency of early communication intervention in young children with and without Down syndrome.

Authors:  Paul Yoder; Tiffany Woynaroski; Marc Fey; Steven Warren
Journal:  Am J Intellect Dev Disabil       Date:  2014-01

Review 9.  Visuo-spatial ability in individuals with Down syndrome: is it really a strength?

Authors:  Yingying Yang; Frances A Conners; Edward C Merrill
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  2014-04-20

10.  Relations between Everyday Executive Functioning and Language in Youth with Down Syndrome and Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  Manisha Udhnani; Megan Perez; Liv S Clasen; Elizabeth Adeyemi; Nancy Raitano Lee
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2020-02-16       Impact factor: 2.253

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.