BACKGROUND: Wear occurring at the interface between the polyethylene insert and metal baseplate of a modular tibial component has become an increasingly common finding at the time of revision total knee arthroplasty. Although this so-called backside wear on retrieved polyethylene inserts has been evaluated in prior studies, wear on retrieved metal baseplates has not been described, to our knowledge. The purposes of the present study were to characterize backside wear on retrieved polyethylene inserts and on the mating surfaces of their corresponding baseplates and to investigate if there is a relationship between backside wear and relative motion of the modular elements. METHODS: Twenty-nine retrieved modular tibial components of twelve fixed-bearing designs were analyzed in vitro with regard to backside wear and relative motion between the polyethylene insert and the metal baseplate. We graded the backside of each polyethylene insert and the mating surface of the metal baseplate for wear with use of a scoring system that consisted of three modes of wear and three levels of severity of wear. Relative motion between the insert and the baseplate was measured in the transverse plane with use of a mechanical testing machine. These measurements were used to compute the insert motion index, which served to quantify unrestricted motion of the insert with respect to the baseplate. RESULTS: The mean insert motion index for the tibial components was 416 micro m (range, 104 micro m to 760 micro m). On a wear-grading scale ranging from 0 to 54 (with 0 indicating no wear), the mean backside wear score was 30 (range, 12 to 48) for the inserts and 28 (range, 7 to 51) for the baseplates. Insert motion was positively correlated with backside polyethylene wear (p = 0.003) and baseplate wear (p < 0.001). Baseplate wear was strongly correlated with backside polyethylene wear (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Backside wear was correlated with the relative motion between the polyethylene insert and the metal baseplate. New locking mechanism designs directed toward better methods of securing the polyethylene insert to the tibial tray are needed to minimize the generation of particulate wear debris at the modular interface.
BACKGROUND: Wear occurring at the interface between the polyethylene insert and metal baseplate of a modular tibial component has become an increasingly common finding at the time of revision total knee arthroplasty. Although this so-called backside wear on retrieved polyethylene inserts has been evaluated in prior studies, wear on retrieved metal baseplates has not been described, to our knowledge. The purposes of the present study were to characterize backside wear on retrieved polyethylene inserts and on the mating surfaces of their corresponding baseplates and to investigate if there is a relationship between backside wear and relative motion of the modular elements. METHODS: Twenty-nine retrieved modular tibial components of twelve fixed-bearing designs were analyzed in vitro with regard to backside wear and relative motion between the polyethylene insert and the metal baseplate. We graded the backside of each polyethylene insert and the mating surface of the metal baseplate for wear with use of a scoring system that consisted of three modes of wear and three levels of severity of wear. Relative motion between the insert and the baseplate was measured in the transverse plane with use of a mechanical testing machine. These measurements were used to compute the insert motion index, which served to quantify unrestricted motion of the insert with respect to the baseplate. RESULTS: The mean insert motion index for the tibial components was 416 micro m (range, 104 micro m to 760 micro m). On a wear-grading scale ranging from 0 to 54 (with 0 indicating no wear), the mean backside wear score was 30 (range, 12 to 48) for the inserts and 28 (range, 7 to 51) for the baseplates. Insert motion was positively correlated with backside polyethylene wear (p = 0.003) and baseplate wear (p < 0.001). Baseplate wear was strongly correlated with backside polyethylene wear (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Backside wear was correlated with the relative motion between the polyethylene insert and the metal baseplate. New locking mechanism designs directed toward better methods of securing the polyethylene insert to the tibial tray are needed to minimize the generation of particulate wear debris at the modular interface.
Authors: Philip M Faris; E Michael Keating; Alex Farris; John B Meding; Merrill A Ritter Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2008-03-07 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Jeffrey T Hodrick; Erik P Severson; Deborah S McAlister; Brian Dahl; Aaron A Hofmann Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2008-09-10 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Melinda Harman; Luca Cristofolini; Paolo Erani; Susanna Stea; Marco Viceconti Journal: J Mater Sci Mater Med Date: 2011-04-02 Impact factor: 3.896
Authors: Arianna Cerquiglini; Johann Henckel; Harry Hothi; Lukas B Moser; Antti Eskelinen; Michael T Hirschmann; Alister J Hart Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2019-02-10 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Richard J Holleyman; Susan C Scholes; David Weir; Simon S Jameson; Jim Holland; Tom J Joyce; David J Deehan Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2014-08-07 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Matthew P Abdel; Mark W Gesell; Christen W Hoedt; Kathleen N Meyers; Timothy M Wright; Steven B Haas Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2014-04-15 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Zachary W Sisko; Matthew G Teeter; Brent A Lanting; James L Howard; Richard W McCalden; Douglas D Naudie; Steven J MacDonald; Edward M Vasarhelyi Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2017-09-13 Impact factor: 4.176