Literature DB >> 12375823

Two-dimensional pencil beam scaling: an improved proton dose algorithm for heterogeneous media.

Hanitra Szymanowski1, Uwe Oelfke.   

Abstract

New dose delivery techniques with proton beams, such as beam spot scanning or raster scanning, require fast and accurate dose algorithms which can be applied for treatment plan optimization in clinically acceptable timescales. The clinically required accuracy is particularly difficult to achieve for the irradiation of complex, heterogeneous regions of the patient's anatomy. Currently applied fast pencil beam dose calculations based on the standard inhomogeneity correction of pathlength scaling often cannot provide the accuracy required for clinically acceptable dose distributions. This could be achieved with sophisticated Monte Carlo simulations which are still unacceptably time consuming for use as dose engines in optimization calculations. We therefore present a new algorithm for proton dose calculations which aims to resolve the inherent problem between calculation speed and required clinical accuracy. First, a detailed derivation of the new concept, which is based on an additional scaling of the lateral proton fluence is provided. Then, the newly devised two-dimensional (2D) scaling method is tested for various geometries of different phantom materials. These include standard biological tissues such as bone, muscle and fat as well as air. A detailed comparison of the new 2D pencil beam scaling with the current standard pencil beam approach and Monte Carlo simulations, performed with GEANT, is presented. It was found that the new concept proposed allows calculation of absorbed dose with an accuracy almost equal to that achievable with Monte Carlo simulations while requiring only modestly increased calculation times in comparison to the standard pencil beam approach. It is believed that this new proton dose algorithm has the potential to significantly improve the treatment planning outcome for many clinical cases encountered in highly conformal proton therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12375823     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/47/18/304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  17 in total

1.  A GPU implementation of a track-repeating algorithm for proton radiotherapy dose calculations.

Authors:  Pablo P Yepes; Dragan Mirkovic; Phillip J Taddei
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  A generalized 2D pencil beam scaling algorithm for proton dose calculation in heterogeneous slab geometries.

Authors:  David C Westerly; Xiaohu Mo; Wolfgang A Tomé; Thomas R Mackie; Paul M DeLuca
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Benchmark measurements and simulations of dose perturbations due to metallic spheres in proton beams.

Authors:  Wayne D Newhauser; Laura Rechner; Dragan Mirkovic; Pablo Yepes; Nicholas C Koch; Uwe Titt; Jonas D Fontenot; Rui Zhang
Journal:  Radiat Meas       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 1.898

4.  Monte Carlo study of radial energy deposition from primary and secondary particles for narrow and large proton beamlet source models.

Authors:  Christopher R Peeler; Uwe Titt
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Dosimetric accuracy of proton therapy for chordoma patients with titanium implants.

Authors:  Joost M Verburg; Joao Seco
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 6.  The physics of proton therapy.

Authors:  Wayne D Newhauser; Rui Zhang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  A procedure to determine the planar integral spot dose values of proton pencil beam spots.

Authors:  Aman Anand; Narayan Sahoo; X Ronald Zhu; Gabriel O Sawakuchi; Falk Poenisch; Richard A Amos; George Ciangaru; Uwe Titt; Kazumichi Suzuki; Radhe Mohan; Michael T Gillin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Quantification of proton dose calculation accuracy in the lung.

Authors:  Clemens Grassberger; Juliane Daartz; Stephen Dowdell; Thomas Ruggieri; Greg Sharp; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Comparison of Monte Carlo and analytical dose computations for intensity modulated proton therapy.

Authors:  Pablo Yepes; Antony Adair; David Grosshans; Dragan Mirkovic; Falk Poenisch; Uwe Titt; Qianxia Wang; Radhe Mohan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 10.  Range uncertainties in proton therapy and the role of Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.