Literature DB >> 12372636

Perception of the periodicity strength of complex sounds by the chinchilla.

William P Shofner1.   

Abstract

The perception of periodicity strength was studied in chinchillas using a stimulus generalization paradigm in an operant-conditioning, positive reinforcement behavioral task. Stimuli consisted of cosine-phase and random-phase harmonic complex tones, infinitely iterated rippled noises, and wideband noise. These stimuli vary in periodicity strength as measured by autocorrelation functions and are known to generate a continuum in the perception of pitch strength in human listeners. Chinchillas were trained to discriminate a cosine-phase harmonic tone complex from wideband noise and tested in the generalization paradigm using random-phase tone complexes and iterated rippled noises as probe stimuli. Chinchillas were tested in three different conditions in which the periods of the fundamental frequencies of the tone complexes were fixed at 2 ms, 4 ms, or 8 ms. Behavioral responses obtained from chinchillas were related to stimulus periodicity strength. For most animals, the behavioral responses to random-phase tone complexes were smaller than those to cosine-phase tone complexes. The behavioral responses were analyzed in terms of the Auditory Image Model of Patterson et al. [Patterson, R.D., Allerhand, M.H., Giguère, C., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98 (1995) 1890-1894], and the results suggest that the periodicity information in the stimulus envelope has a large influence in controlling the behavioral response of the chinchilla. Comparison of the generalization data obtained in the present study to magnitude estimation data obtained previously in human subjects suggests a greater influence of stimulus envelope for the perception of periodicity strength in chinchillas than for the perception of pitch strength in human listeners.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12372636     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(02)00612-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  10 in total

1.  Perception of the missing fundamental by chinchillas in the presence of low-pass masking noise.

Authors:  William P Shofner
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-09-25

2.  Language-experience plasticity in neural representation of changes in pitch salience.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Chandan H Suresh
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-20       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Perceptual interaction between carrier periodicity and amplitude-modulation in the gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus).

Authors:  Lutz Wiegrebe; Veronika Sonnleitner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-11-03       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Cochlear tuning and the peripheral representation of harmonic sounds in mammals.

Authors:  William P Shofner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 2.389

5.  Dual-pitch processing mechanisms in primate auditory cortex.

Authors:  Daniel Bendor; Michael S Osmanski; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Processing pitch in a nonhuman mammal (Chinchilla laniger).

Authors:  William P Shofner; Megan Chaney
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 2.231

7.  The role of harmonic resolvability in pitch perception in a vocal nonhuman primate, the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus).

Authors:  Michael S Osmanski; Xindong Song; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Cortical encoding of pitch: recent results and open questions.

Authors:  Kerry M M Walker; Jennifer K Bizley; Andrew J King; Jan W H Schnupp
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Rabbits use both spectral and temporal cues to discriminate the fundamental frequency of harmonic complexes with missing fundamentals.

Authors:  Joseph D Wagner; Alice Gelman; Kenneth E Hancock; Yoojin Chung; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Across-species differences in pitch perception are consistent with differences in cochlear filtering.

Authors:  Josh H McDermott; Andrew J King; Kerry Mm Walker; Ray Gonzalez; Joe Z Kang
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 8.140

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.