Literature DB >> 12364580

Quantifying the accessible surface area of protein residues in their local environment.

Uttamkumar Samanta1, Ranjit P Bahadur, Pinak Chakrabarti.   

Abstract

The quantification of the packing of residues in proteins and docking of ligands to macromolecules is important in understanding protein stability and drug design. The number of atoms in contact (within a distance of 4.5 A) can be used to describe the local environment of a residue. As this number increases, the accessible surface area (ASA) of the residue decreases exponentially and the variation can be described in terms of an exponential equation of the form y = a(1)exp(-x/a(2)), each residue having its own set of parameters a(1) and a(2), which also depend on whether the whole residue or just the side chain is considered. Hydrophobic and hydrophilic residues can be distinguished on the basis of both the average number of surrounding atoms and the variation of ASA. For a given number of partner atoms, a comparison of the observed ASA with the expected value obtained from the equation provides a method of assessing the goodness of packing of the residue in a protein structure or its importance in the binding of a ligand. The equation provides a method to estimate the ASA of a protein molecule and the average relative accessibilities of different residues, the latter being inversely correlated with hydrophobicity values.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12364580     DOI: 10.1093/protein/15.8.659

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Eng        ISSN: 0269-2139


  31 in total

1.  Salt bridges: geometrically specific, designable interactions.

Authors:  Jason E Donald; Daniel W Kulp; William F DeGrado
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-01-05

2.  Thermodynamic dissection of large-scale domain motions coupled with ligand binding of enzyme I.

Authors:  Young-Joo Yun; Ban-Seok Choi; Eun-Hee Kim; Jeong-Yong Suh
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Theoretical models for electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and local ζ-potential of unfolded proteins in nanopores.

Authors:  Michael J Vitarelli; David S Talaga
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Amino acid interaction preferences in proteins.

Authors:  Anupam Nath Jha; Saraswathi Vishveshwara; Jayanth R Banavar
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Mapping fast protein folding with multiple-site fluorescent probes.

Authors:  Maxim B Prigozhin; Shu-Han Chao; Shahar Sukenik; Taras V Pogorelov; Martin Gruebele
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The hydration structure of guanidinium and thiocyanate ions: implications for protein stability in aqueous solution.

Authors:  P E Mason; G W Neilson; C E Dempsey; A C Barnes; J M Cruickshank
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Energy functions in de novo protein design: current challenges and future prospects.

Authors:  Zhixiu Li; Yuedong Yang; Jian Zhan; Liang Dai; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 12.981

8.  Crystal structure of human plasma platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase: structural implication to lipoprotein binding and catalysis.

Authors:  Uttamkumar Samanta; Brian J Bahnson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Discriminating the native structure from decoys using scoring functions based on the residue packing in globular proteins.

Authors:  Ranjit Prasad Bahadur; Pinak Chakrabarti
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2009-12-28

10.  Predicting helix-helix interactions from residue contacts in membrane proteins.

Authors:  Allan Lo; Yi-Yuan Chiu; Einar Andreas Rødland; Ping-Chiang Lyu; Ting-Yi Sung; Wen-Lian Hsu
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 6.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.