Literature DB >> 12361794

Comparative study of fast MR imaging: quantitative analysis on image quality and efficiency among various time frames and contrast behaviors.

Tao Li1, Scott A Mirowitz.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to quantitatively compare the image quality and efficiency provided by widely available fast MR imaging pulse sequences. A composite phantom with various T1 and T2 values and subjected to periodic motion was imaged at 1.5 T. The fast MRI sequences evaluated included fast spin-echo (FSE), single shot fast spin-echo (SSFSE), echo-planar imaging (EPI), multi-slice gradient recalled (MPGR), fast MPGR (FMPGR), and fast multi-slice spoiled gradient echo (FMPSPGR). T1-weighted (T1WI), T2-weighted (T2WI), proton-density-weighted (PDWI), and T2*-weighted (T2*WI) images were evaluated in breath-hold and non-breath-hold time frames. Analysis included measurement of image signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), nonuniformity, ghosting ratio, SNR per unit time and CNR per unit time. Among fast T2WI sequences, FSE with breath-hold time frame resulted in the highest image quality and in superior SNR and CNR efficiency by a factor of 5 or 6 as compared with conventional spin echo sequence. Among fast T1WI sequences, FMPGR and FMPSPGR both with non-breath-hold time frame produced the highest image quality and SNR and CNR efficiency by a factor of greater than 5 as compared with conventional spin echo. Among fast PDWI and T2*WI sequences, FSE produced the highest SNR and CNR, and was maximally efficient with a factors of greater than 6 as compared with conventional spin echo.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12361794     DOI: 10.1016/s0730-725x(02)00527-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  6 in total

1.  Arterial spin labeling at 3.0 Tesla in subacute ischemia: comparison to dynamic susceptibility perfusion.

Authors:  S Huck; H U Kerl; M Al-Zghloul; C Groden; I Nölte
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 3.649

2.  MR imaging of the cervical spine: assessment of image quality with parallel imaging compared to non-accelerated MR measurements.

Authors:  Iris-M Noebauer-Huhmann; Christian Glaser; Olaf Dietrich; Claus-Peter Wallner; Wolfgang Klinger; Herwig Imhof; Stefan O Schoenberg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  MRI of degenerative lumbar spine disease: comparison of non-accelerated and parallel imaging.

Authors:  Ingo Nölte; Lars Gerigk; Marc A Brockmann; André Kemmling; Christoph Groden
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine: comparison of 2D T2-weighted turbo spin echo, 2D T2*weighted gradient-recalled echo and 3D T2-weighted variable flip-angle turbo spin echo sequences.

Authors:  T Meindl; S Wirth; S Weckbach; O Dietrich; M Reiser; S O Schoenberg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Parallel imaging of the cervical spine at 3T: optimized trade-off between speed and image quality.

Authors:  J Fruehwald-Pallamar; P Szomolanyi; N Fakhrai; A Lunzer; M Weber; M M Thurnher; M Pallamar; S Trattnig; D Prayer; I M Noebauer-Huhmann
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of cervical foraminal stenosis: comparison of 3D T2 SPACE with sagittal oblique 2D T2 TSE.

Authors:  I Barnaure; J Galley; B Fritz; R Sutter
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 2.199

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.