Literature DB >> 12357061

Prevalence of vertebral compression fracture deformity by X-ray absorptiometry of lateral thoracic and lumbar spines in a population referred for bone densitometry.

John T Schousboe1, C Rowan DeBold, Carolyn Bowles, Scott Glickstein, Ranelle K Rubino.   

Abstract

The presence of a vertebral compression fracture has been demonstrated to be a predictor of future fracture independent of bone mineral density in prospective cohort studies. Fan-beam densitometers are now available that can image the thoracic and lumbar spines and detect deformities consistent with fracture. We report a pilot study of 342 patients referred for bone densitometry who had lateral vertebral imaging performed. Fifty patients (14.6%) of the entire cohort had one or more vertebral deformities identified on lateral vertebral imaging. Seventy-three patients (21.3%) of the entire cohort were 60 or more years of age and had osteopenia by World Health Organization (WHO) criteria (T-score: -1.0 to -2.4 at the spine, total hip, or femoral neck). Twenty of these patients (27.4%) had one or more vertebral deformities. Without identifying prevalent vertebral deformities, these individuals at high risk for fracture may not be offered pharmacologic therapy to reduce fracture risk. Therefore, it may be reasonable to obtain lateral vertebral imaging at least for individuals age > or =60 yr who have mild to moderate bone loss at the spine or hip.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12357061     DOI: 10.1385/jcd:5:3:239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.963


  13 in total

1.  Use of a performance algorithm improves utilization of vertebral fracture assessment in clinical practice.

Authors:  J T Schousboe; F McKiernan; J T Fuehrer; N Binkley
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Reliability and accuracy of vertebral fracture assessment with densitometry compared to radiography in clinical practice.

Authors:  John T Schousboe; C Rowan Debold
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-09-20       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Potential cost-effective use of spine radiographs to detect vertebral deformity and select osteopenic post-menopausal women for amino-bisphosphonate therapy.

Authors:  John T Schousboe; Kristine E Ensrud; John A Nyman; Robert L Kane; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-08-31       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Identification of vertebral fractures: an update.

Authors:  L Ferrar; G Jiang; J Adams; R Eastell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Vertebral fracture assessment by DXA is inferior to X-ray in clinical severe osteoporosis.

Authors:  L Deleskog; N Ø Laursen; B R Nielsen; P Schwarz
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  Vertebroplasty for osteoporotic spine fracture: prevention and treatment.

Authors:  A Mehbod; S Aunoble; J C Le Huec
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-09-19       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Routine versus targeted vertebral fracture assessment for the detection of vertebral fractures.

Authors:  E T Middleton; S A Steel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  An evaluation of densitometric vertebral fracture assessment in men.

Authors:  N Vallarta-Ast; D Krueger; C Wrase; S Agrawal; N Binkley
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-04-28       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Clinical utility of dual-energy vertebral assessment (DVA).

Authors:  Tamara J Vokes; Larry B Dixon; Murray J Favus
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-09-11       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 10.  The aging spine: new technologies and therapeutics for the osteoporotic spine.

Authors:  Joseph M Lane; Michael J Gardner; Julie T Lin; Marjolein C van der Meulen; Elizabeth Myers
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-10-08       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.