Literature DB >> 28812222

Ethics and Phishing Experiments.

David B Resnik1, Peter R Finn2.   

Abstract

Phishing is a fraudulent form of email that solicits personal or financial information from the recipient, such as a password, username, or social security or bank account number. The scammer may use the illicitly obtained information to steal the victim's money or identity or sell the information to another party. The direct costs of phishing on consumers are exceptionally high and have risen substantially over the past 12 years. Phishing experiments that simulate real world conditions can provide cybersecurity experts with valuable knowledge they can use to develop effective countermeasures and prevent people from being duped by phishing emails. Although these experiments contravene widely accepted informed consent requirements and involve deception, we argue that they can be conducted ethically if risks are minimized, confidentiality and privacy are protected, potential participants have an opportunity to opt out of the research before it begins, and human subjects are debriefed after their participation ends.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cybersecurity; Debriefing; Deception; Ethics; Human experimentation; Informed consent; Phishing

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28812222     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-017-9952-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  20 in total

1.  Rules for research on human genetic variation--lessons from Iceland.

Authors:  G J Annas
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  What makes clinical research ethical?

Authors:  E J Emanuel; D Wendler; C Grady
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000 May 24-31       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Recruiting patients to medical research: double blind randomised trial of "opt-in" versus "opt-out" strategies.

Authors:  Cornelia Junghans; Gene Feder; Harry Hemingway; Adam Timmis; Melvyn Jones
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-09-12

4.  General justifications for public health regulation.

Authors:  Lawrence O Gostin
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  2007-08-27       Impact factor: 2.427

5.  Debriefing in deceptive research: a proposed new procedure.

Authors:  Malgorzata Oczak; Agnieszka Niedźwieńska
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.742

6.  Research on medical records without informed consent.

Authors:  Franklin G Miller
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.718

7.  Computer science security research and human subjects: emerging considerations for research ethics boards.

Authors:  Elizabeth Buchanan; John Aycock; Scott Dexter; David Dittrich; Erin Hvizdak
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.742

8.  When and Why Is Research without Consent Permissible?

Authors:  Luke Gelinas; Alan Wertheimer; Franklin G Miller
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 2.683

9.  Deception in social science research: is informed consent possible?

Authors:  A Soble
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 2.683

10.  Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects. Final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2017-01-19
View more
  2 in total

1.  Phishing in healthcare organisations: threats, mitigation and approaches.

Authors:  Ward Priestman; Tony Anstis; Isabel G Sebire; Shankar Sridharan; Neil J Sebire
Journal:  BMJ Health Care Inform       Date:  2019-09

2.  Phishing simulation exercise in a large hospital: A case study.

Authors:  Fabio Rizzoni; Sabina Magalini; Alessandra Casaroli; Pasquale Mari; Matt Dixon; Lynne Coventry
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2022-03-16
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.