Literature DB >> 12709329

In vitro pharmacodynamic evaluation of the mutant selection window hypothesis using four fluoroquinolones against Staphylococcus aureus.

Alexander A Firsov1, Sergey N Vostrov, Irene Y Lubenko, Karl Drlica, Yury A Portnoy, Stephen H Zinner.   

Abstract

To study the hypothesis of the mutant selection window (MSW) in a pharmacodynamic context, the susceptibility of a clinical isolate of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus exposed to moxifloxacin (MOX), gatifloxacin (GAT), levofloxacin (LEV), and ciprofloxacin (CIP) was tested daily by using an in vitro dynamic model that simulates human pharmacokinetics. A series of monoexponential pharmacokinetic profiles that mimic once-daily administration of MOX (half-life, 12 h), GAT (half-life, 7 h), and LEV (half-life, 6.8 h) and twice-daily administration of CIP (half-life, 4 h) provided peak concentrations (C(max)) that either equaled the MIC, fell between the MIC and the mutant prevention concentration (MPC) (i.e., within or "inside" the MSW), or exceeded the MPC. The respective ratios of the area under the curve (AUC) over a 24-h dosing interval (AUC(24)) to the MIC varied from 13 to 244 h, and the starting inoculum was 10(8) CFU/ml (6 x 10(9) CFU per 60-ml central compartment). With all four quinolones, the greatest increases in MIC were observed at those AUC(24)/MIC values (from 24 to 62 h) that corresponded to quinolone concentrations within the MSW over most of the dosing interval (>20%). Less-pronounced increases in MIC were associated with the smallest simulated AUC(24)/MIC values (15 to 16 h) of GAT and CIP, whose C(max) exceeded the MICs. No such increases were observed with the smallest AUC(24)/MIC values (13 to 17 h) of MOX and LEV, whose C(max) were close to the MICs. Also, less pronounced but significant increases in MIC occurred at AUC(24)/MIC values (107 to 123 h) that correspond to quinolone concentrations partly overlapping the MIC-to-MPC range. With all four drugs, no change in MIC was seen at the highest AUC(24)/MIC values (201 to 244 h), where quinolone concentrations exceeded the MPC over most of the dosing interval. These "protective" AUC(24)/MIC ratios correspond to 66% of the usual clinical dose of MOX (400 mg), 190% of a 400-mg dose of GAT, 220% of a 500-mg dose of LEV, and 420% of two 500-mg doses of CIP. Thus, MOX may protect against resistance development at subtherapeutic doses, whereas GAT, LEV, and CIP provide similar effects only at doses that exceed their usual clinical doses. These data support the concept that resistant mutants are selectively enriched when antibiotic concentrations fall inside the MSW and suggest that in vitro dynamic models can be used to predict the relative abilities of quinolones to prevent mutant selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12709329      PMCID: PMC153314          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.47.5.1604-1613.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  33 in total

1.  Activities of newer fluoroquinolones against ciprofloxacin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Authors:  E A Coyle; G W Kaatz; M J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Pharmacodynamics of trovafloxacin and levofloxacin against Bacteroides fragilis in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model.

Authors:  M L Peterson; L B Hovde; D H Wright; G H Brown; A D Hoang; J C Rotschafer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  The effect of pharmacokinetics on the bactericidal activity of ciprofloxacin and sparfloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae and the emergence of resistance.

Authors:  C E Thorburn; D I Edwards
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.790

4.  Fluoroquinolone resistance in anaerobic bacteria following exposure to levofloxacin, trovafloxacin, and sparfloxacin in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model.

Authors:  G H Ross; D H Wright; L B Hovde; M L Peterson; J C Rotschafer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Restricting the selection of antibiotic-resistant mutants: a general strategy derived from fluoroquinolone studies.

Authors:  X Zhao; K Drlica
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  In vitro pharmacodynamic modelling simulating free serum concentrations of fluoroquinolones against multidrug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Authors:  G G Zhanel; M Walters; N Laing; D J Hoban
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.790

7.  Comparative bactericidal activities of ciprofloxacin, clinafloxacin, grepafloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and trovafloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae in a dynamic in vitro model.

Authors:  M E Klepser; E J Ernst; C R Petzold; P Rhomberg; G V Doern
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Comparative pharmacodynamics of gatifloxacin and ciprofloxacin in an in vitro dynamic model: prediction of equiefficient doses and the breakpoints of the area under the curve/MIC ratio.

Authors:  S N Vostrov; O V Kononenko; I Y Lubenko; S H Zinner; A A Firsov
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Comparative pharmacodynamics of moxifloxacin and levofloxacin in an in vitro dynamic model: prediction of the equivalent AUC/MIC breakpoints and equiefficient doses.

Authors:  A A Firsov; I Y Lubenko; S N Vostrov; O V Kononenko; S H Zinner; Y A Portnoy
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.790

10.  The effects of NorA inhibition on the activities of levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin against two genetically related strains of Staphylococcus aureus in an in-vitro infection model.

Authors:  J R Aeschlimann; G W Kaatz; M J Rybak
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.790

View more
  64 in total

1.  The Advantage of Bactericidal Drugs in the Treatment of Infection.

Authors:  Jeffrey Alder; Barry Eisenstein
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 2.  Dosing regimen matters: the importance of early intervention and rapid attainment of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target.

Authors:  Marilyn N Martinez; Mark G Papich; George L Drusano
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Suppression of Emergence of Resistance in Pathogenic Bacteria: Keeping Our Powder Dry, Part 1.

Authors:  G L Drusano; Arnold Louie; Alasdair MacGowan; William Hope
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  In vitro antibacterial activities of JNJ-Q2, a new broad-spectrum fluoroquinolone.

Authors:  Brian J Morrow; Wenping He; Karen M Amsler; Barbara D Foleno; Mark J Macielag; A Simon Lynch; Karen Bush
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Pharmacodynamic model to describe the concentration-dependent selection of cefotaxime-resistant Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Sara K Olofsson; Patricia Geli; Dan I Andersson; Otto Cars
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Mutant prevention concentrations of ABT-492, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and gatifloxacin against three common respiratory pathogens.

Authors:  Elizabeth D Hermsen; Laurie B Hovde; George N Konstantinides; John C Rotschafer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Impact of antimicrobial dosing regimen on evolution of drug resistance in vivo: fluconazole and Candida albicans.

Authors:  D Andes; A Forrest; A Lepak; J Nett; K Marchillo; L Lincoln
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  In vivo fluconazole pharmacodynamics and resistance development in a previously susceptible Candida albicans population examined by microbiologic and transcriptional profiling.

Authors:  D Andes; A Lepak; J Nett; L Lincoln; K Marchillo
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  In vivo efficacy of moxifloxacin compared with cloxacillin and vancomycin in a Staphylococcus aureus rabbit arthritis experimental model.

Authors:  Olivier Grossi; Jocelyne Caillon; Cedric Arvieux; Cedric Jacqueline; Denis Bugnon; Gilles Potel; Antoine Hamel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Novel concentration-killing curve method for estimation of bactericidal potency of antibiotics in an in vitro dynamic model.

Authors:  Y Q Liu; Y Z Zhang; P J Gao
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.