BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Medical procedures, for example, laser angioplasty and extracorporeal lithotripsy as well as high-energy trauma expose human tissues to shock waves (SWs) that may cause tissue injury. The mechanisms for this injury, often affecting blood vessel walls, are poorly understood. Here we sought to assess the role of two suggested factors, viz., cavitation or reactive oxygen species (ROS). STUDY DESIGN/ MATERIALS AND METHODS: A laser driven flyer-plate model was used to expose human umbilical cord vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) monolayers to SWs or to SWs plus cavitation (SWC). Cell injury was quantified with morphometry, trypan blue staining, and release of (51)Cr from labeled HUVECs. RESULTS: HUVECs, exposed to SWs only, could not be distinguished from controls in morphological appearance or ability to exclude trypan blue. Yet, release of (51)Cr, indicated a significant cell injury (P < 0.05). HUVEC cultures exposed to SWC, exhibited cell detachment and cell membrane damage detectable with trypan blue. Release of (51)Cr was fourfold compared to SW samples (P < 0.01). Signs of cell injury were evident at 15 minutes and did not change over the next 4 hours. No protective effects of ROS scavengers were demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS: Independent of ROS, SWC generated an immediate cell injury, which can explain, for example, vessel wall perturbation described in relation to SW treatments and trauma. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Medical procedures, for example, laser angioplasty and extracorporeal lithotripsy as well as high-energy trauma expose human tissues to shock waves (SWs) that may cause tissue injury. The mechanisms for this injury, often affecting blood vessel walls, are poorly understood. Here we sought to assess the role of two suggested factors, viz., cavitation or reactive oxygen species (ROS). STUDY DESIGN/ MATERIALS AND METHODS: A laser driven flyer-plate model was used to expose human umbilical cord vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) monolayers to SWs or to SWs plus cavitation (SWC). Cell injury was quantified with morphometry, trypan blue staining, and release of (51)Cr from labeled HUVECs. RESULTS: HUVECs, exposed to SWs only, could not be distinguished from controls in morphological appearance or ability to exclude trypan blue. Yet, release of (51)Cr, indicated a significant cell injury (P < 0.05). HUVEC cultures exposed to SWC, exhibited cell detachment and cell membrane damage detectable with trypan blue. Release of (51)Cr was fourfold compared to SW samples (P < 0.01). Signs of cell injury were evident at 15 minutes and did not change over the next 4 hours. No protective effects of ROS scavengers were demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS: Independent of ROS, SWC generated an immediate cell injury, which can explain, for example, vessel wall perturbation described in relation to SW treatments and trauma. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Adam D Maxwell; Tzu-Yin Wang; Lingqian Yuan; Alexander P Duryea; Zhen Xu; Charles A Cain Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2010-10-28 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: Yuli Cao; Mårten Risling; Elisabeth Malm; Anders Sondén; Magnus Frödin Bolling; Mattias K Sköld Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2016-02-01 Impact factor: 4.003