| Literature DB >> 26869990 |
Yuli Cao1, Mårten Risling1, Elisabeth Malm1, Anders Sondén2, Magnus Frödin Bolling3, Mattias K Sköld4.
Abstract
The mechanisms involved in traumatic brain injury have yet to be fully characterized. One mechanism that, especially in high-energy trauma, could be of importance is cavitation. Cavitation can be described as a process of vaporization, bubble generation, and bubble implosion as a result of a decrease and subsequent increase in pressure. Cavitation as an injury mechanism is difficult to visualize and model due to its short duration and limited spatial distribution. One strategy to analyze the cellular response of cavitation is to employ suitable in vitro models. The flyer-plate model is an in vitro high-energy trauma model that includes cavitation as a trauma mechanism. A copper fragment is accelerated by means of a laser, hits the bottom of a cell culture well causing cavitation, and shock waves inside the well and cell medium. We have found the flyer-plate model to be efficient, reproducible, and easy to control. In this study, we have used the model to analyze the cellular response to microcavitation in SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma, Caco-2, and C6 glioma cell lines. Mitotic activity in neuroblastoma and glioma was investigated with BrdU staining, and cell numbers were calculated using automated time-lapse imaging. We found variations between cell types and between different zones surrounding the lesion with these methods. It was also shown that the injured cell cultures released S-100B in a dose-dependent manner. Using gene expression microarray, a number of gene families of potential interest were found to be strongly, but differently regulated in neuroblastoma and glioma at 24 h post trauma. The data from the gene expression arrays may be used to identify new candidates for biomarkers in cavitation trauma. We conclude that our model is useful for studies of trauma in vitro and that it could be applied in future treatment studies.Entities:
Keywords: automatic time-lapse imaging; flyer-plate; glioma; in vitro high-energy cavitation trauma model; mitosis; neuroblastoma; post trauma mechanisms; regulated differential gene expression
Year: 2016 PMID: 26869990 PMCID: PMC4734234 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2016.00010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.003
Figure 1Schematic of the flyer-plate model, where a cell monolayer is exposed to a shock wave cavitation trauma (SWCT). A well is placed atop the copper–silica window, which is hit by a laser. A piece of copper (a flyer-plate) becomes accelerated and hits the well bottom. Cavitation develops at the bottom and the surface of the medium when using 400 or 600 μl medium/well.
Number of colonies and cell type used in assessment of lesion size with varied medium volumes.
| 0.4 ml medium/well upon exposure | 1 ml medium/well upon exposure | |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroblastoma | ||
| Glioma | ||
| Caco2 |
The same cultures were photographed at five time intervals: 0.75–1.00, 3.33–4.33, 5.50–6.17, 23.00–23.50, and 26.00–26.33 h post trauma.
Number of traumatized and control cultures used for gene array analysis.
| No. of colonies in each sample | No. of samples | Medium volume (ml) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neuroblastoma | 1 colony | 3 traumatized | 3 controls | 0.4 |
| Glioma | 8 colonies | 3 traumatized | 3 controls | 0.4 |
Figure 2(A) An overview of the morphology of a cell culture of neuroblastoma after in vitro flyer-plate trauma. Zone A is the central lesion area, devoid of cells. Zone B is the lesion periphery where there are still viable cells mixed with dying cells and cell debris. Zone C is the confluent cell layer with unaffected cells. (B) Example of how the elliptical tool was applied. ImageJ’s elliptical tool was used to give an approximation of the lesion size. As shown in the picture every ellipse was drawn to follow the lesion periphery. Lesion periphery was defined as the area outside the central area devoid of cells but with cells in a more scattered pattern than in the confluent zone.
Number of observation (.
| Lesion periphery | Confluent zone | Control | Medium volume (ml) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neuroblastoma | 20 ( | 18 ( | 17 ( | 0.4 |
| Glioma | 13 ( | 17 ( | 19 ( | 0.4 |
Number of colonies used in the cell IQ assessment.
| No. of traumatized colonies | No. of controls | Medium volume (ml) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neuroblastoma | 0.4 | ||
| Glioma | 0.4 | ||
| Caco2 | 0.4 |
Number of glioma colonies used in the S100B experiments for each exposure condition.
| No. of insults/colony | S100B assessed colonies | Medium volume/well upon exposure (ml) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Glioma controls | 0 insult | 0.6 | |
| Glioma trauma colony | 1 insult | 0.6 | |
| Glioma trauma colony | 2 insults | 0.6 |
Figure 3Lesion size dependence on volume of medium in a glioma monolayer. (A) Large lesion with 0.4 ml medium/well. (B) Small lesion with 1 ml medium/well. Both micrographs were taken immediately after trauma exposure, with the scale bar at 1 mm in both pictures.
Figure 4(A–E) A glioma lesion posttrauma. The lesion periphery is a less cell-dense zone between the lesion and the confluent cell population. Time posttrauma (A) 0.75 h; (B) 3.33 h; (C) 6.00 h; (D) 23.00 h; (E) 26 h. The microscope scale is 1 mm for all micrographs.
Figure 7Cell count (normalized mean ± SD) in lesion peripheries vs. control-colonies of Caco-2, trauma exposures in (A). Micrographs of live Caco-2 – first (B) and last images post trauma illustrating growth at the lesion periphery (C). The red dots indicate counted cells. Original magnification 10×. Incubated, photographed, and counted by Cell-IQ. (D) shows microphotograph overview of injury to Caco-2 cells that typically resulted in multiple separated patches devoid of cells.
Figure 5Lesion size–time relationships appear to be linear, see . A characterizing yet very approximate parameter of regeneration is the slope. Each line represents one cell type with its own slope. The slopes are significantly non-zero, all P-values <0.0001. (A) Lesion perimeter normalized mean ± SD (%) vs. time posttrauma (hours). (B) Lesion area normalized mean ± SD (%) vs. time posttrauma (hours).
Figure 6Cell count (normalized mean ± SD) in lesion peripheries vs. control-colonies of glioma. Trauma exposures in two different sets of measurements (A,B) are shown. Micrographs of live glioma – first (C) and last (D) images post trauma – illustrating growth at the lesion periphery. The red dots indicate counted cells. Original magnification 10×.
Figure 8Cell count (normalized mean ± SD) in lesion peripheries vs. control-colonies of neuroblastoma. Trauma exposures in two different sets of measurements (A,B) are shown. Micrographs of live neuroblastoma – first (C) and last (D) images post trauma – illustrating growth at the lesion periphery. The red dots indicate counted cells. Original magnification 10×. Incubated, photographed, and counted by Cell-IQ.
Figure 9(A) Mitosis percentage statistically analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni posttest. Mitosis percentage is significantly different between cell types (P < 0.0001). The difference between periphery and confluent zones is significant in glioma (P < 0.0001) and neuroblastoma (P < 0.01). The difference between periphery and control is significant in glioma (P < 0.0001), but not in neuroblastoma (P > 0.05). The confluent zones and controls are mitotically similar, in both cell types (P > 0.05). Mean ± SEM. n glioma periphery = 13, n glioma confluent = 17, n glioma control = 19; n neuroblastoma periphery = 20, n neuroblastoma confluent = 18, n neuroblastoma control = 17. (B) BrdU (pink) and DAPI (blue) stained glioma (24 h posttrauma) with high percentage of mitosis in the periphery. (C) Low percentage of mitosis in the confluent zone. (D) Low percentage of mitosis in controls. The scales in all images are 1 μm.
Figure 10Colonies that received more insults had higher S100B concentrations. S100B concentration was lower 24 h posttrauma than immediately after trauma. Mean ± SEM.
Figure 11The number of genes regulated, traumatized vs. control, . Immune response, cell cycle/division, and cell death are three themes of regulated gene expression.
Regulated genes (traumatized vs. control) in glioma, .
| Annotation cluster 1, enrichment score: 1.79 | Term | |
|---|---|---|
| GOTERM_BP_FAT | GO:0007186 ~ G-protein coupled receptor protein signaling pathway | 0.0005 |
| GOTERM_BP_FAT | GO:0007166 ~ cell surface receptor linked signal transduction | 0.0028 |
| GOTERM_BP_FAT | GO:0050877 ~ neurological system process | 0.0078 |
| GOTERM_BP_FAT | GO:0009593 ~ detection of chemical stimulus | 0.0137 |
| GOTERM_BP_FAT | GO:0007606 ~ sensory perception of chemical stimulus | 0.0138 |
| GOTERM_BP_FAT | GO:0051606 ~ detection of stimulus | 0.0141 |
| GOTERM_MF_FAT | GO:0004984 ~ olfactory receptor activity | 0.0180 |
| GOTERM_BP_FAT | GO:0007600 ~ sensory perception | 0.0187 |
| GOTERM_BP_FAT | GO:0050906 ~ detection of stimulus involved in sensory perception | 0.0231 |
| GOTERM_BP_FAT | GO:0050911 ~ detection of chemical stimulus involved in sensory perception of smell | 0.0305 |
| GOTERM_BP_FAT | GO:0007608 ~ sensory perception of smell | 0.0313 |
| GOTERM_BP_FAT | GO:0050907 ~ detection of chemical stimulus involved in sensory perception | 0.0344 |
| GOTERM_BP_FAT | GO:0050890 ~ cognition | 0.0386 |
Top functional annotation cluster, enrichment score >1.3.
Regulated genes (traumatized vs. control) in neuroblastoma, .
| Term | ||
|---|---|---|
| GOTERM_CC_FAT | GO:0031974 ~ membrane-enclosed lumen | 0.0021 |
| GOTERM_CC_FAT | GO:0043233 ~ organelle lumen | 0.0056 |
| GOTERM_CC_FAT | GO:0070013 ~ intracellular organelle lumen | 0.0065 |
| GOTERM_CC_FAT | GO:0005654 ~ nucleoplasm | 0.0132 |
| GOTERM_CC_FAT | GO:0031981 ~ nuclear lumen | 0.0230 |
| GOTERM_CC_FAT | GO:0044451 ~ nucleoplasm part | 0.0501 |
| GOTERM_CC_FAT | GO:0005730 ~ nucleolus | 0.1888 |
| GOTERM_BP_FAT | GO:0030521 ~ androgen receptor signaling pathway | 0.0020 |
| GOTERM_MF_FAT | GO:0035257 ~ nuclear hormone receptor binding | 0.0024 |
| GOTERM_MF_FAT | GO:0050681 ~ androgen receptor binding | 0.0025 |
| GOTERM_MF_FAT | GO:0035258 ~ steroid hormone receptor binding | 0.0027 |
| GOTERM_BP_FAT | GO:0030518 ~ steroid hormone receptor signaling pathway | 0.0056 |
| GOTERM_MF_FAT | GO:0051427 ~ hormone receptor binding | 0.0058 |
| GOTERM_BP_FAT | GO:0030522 ~ intracellular receptor-mediated signaling pathway | 0.0216 |
| GOTERM_MF_FAT | GO:0003713 ~ transcription coactivator activity | 0.2873 |
| GOTERM_MF_FAT | GO:0008134 ~ transcription factor binding | 0.4615 |
| GOTERM_MF_FAT | GO:0003712 ~ transcription cofactor activity | 0.6143 |
| INTERPRO | IPR013787:S100/CaBP-9k-type, calcium binding, subdomain | 0.0149 |
| INTERPRO | IPR001751:S100/CaBP-9k-type, calcium binding | 0.0169 |
| UP_SEQ_FEATURE | calcium-binding region:1; low affinity | 0.0255 |
| PIR_SUPERFAMILY | PIRSF002353:S-100 protein | 0.0317 |
| UP_SEQ_FEATURE | calcium-binding region:2; high affinity | 0.0384 |
| SP_PIR_KEYWORDS | EF hand | 0.3661 |
| GOTERM_BP_FAT | GO:0000723 ~ telomere maintenance | 0.0193 |
| GOTERM_BP_FAT | GO:0032200 ~ telomere organization | 0.0217 |
| GOTERM_MF_FAT | GO:0008094 ~ DNA-dependent ATPase activity | 0.0628 |
| GOTERM_BP_FAT | GO:0060249 ~ anatomical structure homeostasis | 0.2044 |
| GOTERM_BP_FAT | GO:0010921 ~ regulation of phosphatase activity | 0.0278 |
| GOTERM_BP_FAT | GO:0035303 ~ regulation of dephosphorylation | 0.0712 |
| GOTERM_BP_FAT | GO:0043666 ~ regulation of phosphoprotein phosphatase activity | 0.0827 |
| GOTERM_CC_FAT | GO:0005740 ~ mitochondrial envelope | 0.0105 |
| GOTERM_CC_FAT | GO:0044429 ~ mitochondrial part | 0.0175 |
| GOTERM_CC_FAT | GO:0031966 ~ mitochondrial membrane | 0.0176 |
| GOTERM_CC_FAT | GO:0031967 ~ organelle envelope | 0.0183 |
| GOTERM_CC_FAT | GO:0031975 ~ envelope | 0.0189 |
| GOTERM_CC_FAT | GO:0005743 ~ mitochondrial inner membrane | 0.0934 |
| GOTERM_CC_FAT | GO:0031090 ~ organelle membrane | 0.1016 |
| GOTERM_CC_FAT | GO:0019866 ~ organelle inner membrane | 0.1465 |
| SP_PIR_KEYWORDS | mitochondrion inner membrane | 0.1580 |
| SP_PIR_KEYWORDS | Mitochondrion | 0.1866 |
| GOTERM_CC_FAT | GO:0005739 ~ mitochondrion | 0.3041 |
Top functional annotation clusters, enrichment score >1.3.