Literature DB >> 12354634

Human cortical responses to coherent and incoherent motion as measured by magnetoencephalography.

Koichi Maruyama1, Yoshiki Kaneoke, Kazuyoshi Watanabe, Ryusuke Kakigi.   

Abstract

To investigate the detail response properties for the incoherent motion of the human visual system, we measured the magnetoencephalographic neural responses to both coherent and incoherent motions at various speeds (from 0.65 to 20.6 degrees /s). The peak latency of the first component of the response from the extrastriate area was inversely related to the speed of motion (from 228 to 155 ms in mean) and there was no significant difference in the latency change between the two types of motion. There were significant differences in the peak amplitude change with the motion speed and a difference in the distribution of the magnetic fields of the responses was seen in six of the seven subjects. The results show that the speed of the incoherently moving dots is represented in the human visual system in the same manner as that of coherently moving dots. The differences in the magnetic fields between the two responses indicate that the same speed-related response changes can occur with different neural populations responsible for both motions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12354634     DOI: 10.1016/s0168-0102(02)00129-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Res        ISSN: 0168-0102            Impact factor:   3.304


  9 in total

1.  Detection of motion onset and offset: reaction time and visual evoked potential analysis.

Authors:  Kairi Kreegipuu; Jüri Allik
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-04-25

Review 2.  A primer on motion visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Sven P Heinrich
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Abnormalities of coherent motion processing in strabismic amblyopia: Visual-evoked potential measurements.

Authors:  Chuan Hou; Mark W Pettet; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Motion-onset visual evoked potentials predict performance during a global direction discrimination task.

Authors:  Tim Martin; Krystel R Huxlin; Voyko Kavcic
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-08-14       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Physiological evidence of interaction of first- and second-order motion processes in the human visual system: a magnetoencephalographic study.

Authors:  Ayako Sofue; Yoshiki Kaneoke; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Perception of structured optic flow and random visual motion in infants and adults: a high-density EEG study.

Authors:  Audrey L H van der Meer; Gjertrud Fallet; F R Ruud van der Weel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Children with cerebral palsy display altered neural oscillations within the visual MT/V5 cortices.

Authors:  Jacy R VerMaas; James E Gehringer; Tony W Wilson; Max J Kurz
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 4.881

8.  A high-density EEG study of differences between three high speeds of simulated forward motion from optic flow in adult participants.

Authors:  Kenneth Vilhelmsen; F R Ruud van der Weel; Audrey L H van der Meer
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-26

9.  Functional Segregation of the Middle Temporal Visual Motion Area Revealed With Coactivation-Based Parcellation.

Authors:  Jingjing Gao; Min Zeng; Xin Dai; Xun Yang; Haibo Yu; Kai Chen; Qingmao Hu; Jinping Xu; Bochao Cheng; Jiaojian Wang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 4.677

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.