Literature DB >> 14601142

Physiological evidence of interaction of first- and second-order motion processes in the human visual system: a magnetoencephalographic study.

Ayako Sofue1, Yoshiki Kaneoke, Ryusuke Kakigi.   

Abstract

Humans have several mechanisms for the visual perception of motion, including one that is luminance-based (first-order) and another that is luminance-independent (second-order). Recent psychophysical studies have suggested that significant interaction occurs between these two neural processes. We investigated whether such interactions are represented as neural activity measured by magnetoencephalography (MEG). The second-order motion of a drifting sinusoidal grating, which is defined by the speed of the dot motion, did not generate a response. Apparent motion (AM) of the square area, defined by the speed of randomly moving dots, evoked a magnetic response whose latency and amplitude changed with the distance that the area moved (a second-order characteristic), though the response properties were significantly different from those for the first-order AM. AM, defined by both first- and second-order attributes, evoked an MEG response and the latencies and the amplitudes were distributed between those for the first- and second-order motions. The cortical source of the response was estimated to be around MT+. The results show a distinct difference in the neural processing of the second-order motion that cannot be explained by the difference in visibility, and they indicate that the interaction of the neural processes underlying first- and second-order motion detection occurs before the MEG response. Our study provides the first physiological evidence of a neural interaction between the two types of early motion detection. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14601142      PMCID: PMC6871786          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.10138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  45 in total

Review 1.  Central neural mechanisms for detecting second-order motion.

Authors:  C L Baker
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Visualization of magnetoencephalographic data using minimum current estimates.

Authors:  K Uutela; M Hämäläinen; E Somersalo
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 3.  Three-systems theory of human visual motion perception: review and update.

Authors:  Z L Lu; G Sperling
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.129

4.  Longer VEP latencies and slower reaction times to the onset of second-order motion than to the onset of first-order motion.

Authors:  D Ellemberg; K Lavoie; T L Lewis; D Maurer; F Lepore; J-P Guillemot
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Form-cue invariant motion processing in primate visual cortex.

Authors:  T D Albright
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-02-28       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Motion: the long and short of it.

Authors:  P Cavanagh; G Mather
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1989

7.  Human cortical area responding to stimuli in apparent motion.

Authors:  Y Kaneoke; M Bundou; S Koyama; H Suzuki; R Kakigi
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1997-02-10       Impact factor: 1.837

8.  Visual detection of motion speed in humans: spatiotemporal analysis by fMRI and MEG.

Authors:  Osamu Kawakami; Yoshiki Kaneoke; Koichi Maruyama; Ryusuke Kakigi; Tomohisa Okada; Norihiro Sadato; Yoshiharu Yonekura
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  A processing stream in mammalian visual cortex neurons for non-Fourier responses.

Authors:  Y X Zhou; C L Baker
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-07-02       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Human cortical responses to coherent and incoherent motion as measured by magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  Koichi Maruyama; Yoshiki Kaneoke; Kazuyoshi Watanabe; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Neurosci Res       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.304

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  A primer on motion visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Sven P Heinrich
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Neural dynamics of reward probability coding: a Magnetoencephalographic study in humans.

Authors:  Julie Thomas; Giovanna Vanni-Mercier; Jean-Claude Dreher
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 4.677

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.