Literature DB >> 12028778

Eavesdropping on visual cues in green swordtail (Xiphophorus helleri) fights: a case for networking.

Ryan L Earley1, Lee Alan Dugatkin.   

Abstract

Aggressive contests probably occur in networking environments where information about fighting ability is conveyed both to an opponent and to individuals peripheral to the fight itself, the bystanders. Our primary aim was to investigate the relative influences of eavesdropping and prior social experience on the dynamics of aggressive contests in Xiphophorus helleri. A bystander's ability to witness an encounter was manipulated using clear, one-way mirror, and opaque partitions. After watching (or not watching) the initial contest, the bystander encountered either the winner or loser of the bout. Treatment comparisons of bystander-winner or bystander-loser contest dynamics indicated the presence or absence of winner, loser, or eavesdropping effects. Winner and loser effects had negligible influences on bystander contest dynamics. Eavesdropping significantly reduced the bystander's propensity to initiate aggression, escalate, and win against seen winners regardless of whether the watched bout had escalated or not. Though eavesdropping had relatively little effect on bystander-loser contest dynamics, bystanders were less prone to initiate aggression and win against losers that had escalated in the witnessed bout. Thus, bystanders appear to preferentially retain and utilize information gained about potentially dangerous opponents (winners or persistent losers). Our data lend clear support for the importance of eavesdropping in visually based aggressive signalling systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12028778      PMCID: PMC1690975          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2002.1973

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  9 in total

1.  Eavesdropping and animal conflict.

Authors:  R A Johnstone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Male great tits eavesdrop on simulated male-to-male vocal interactions.

Authors:  T M Peake; A M Terry; P K McGregor; T Dabelsteen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Gradually escalating fights and displays: the cumulative assessment model.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.844

4.  Body size and agonistic experience affect dominance and mating success in male copperheads

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.844

5.  The effect of submissive experiences on dominance and aggressive behaviour of Xiphophorus (Pisces, Poeciliidae).

Authors:  G Thines; B Heuts
Journal:  Z Tierpsychol       Date:  1968-03

6.  The winner and loser effect: integrating multiple experiences.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.844

7.  Distinguishing kinds of prior dominance and subordination experiences in males of green swordtail fish (Xiphophorus helleri).

Authors: 
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2000-08-17       Impact factor: 1.777

8.  Effects of dyadic vocal interactions on other conspecific receivers in nightingales.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.844

9.  Watch and learn: preview of the fighting ability of opponents alters contest behaviour in rainbow trout.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.844

  9 in total
  27 in total

Review 1.  Information and aggression in fishes.

Authors:  Tom M Peake; Peter K McGregor
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Evolution of spite through indirect reciprocity.

Authors:  Rufus A Johnstone; Redouan Bshary
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Examination of prior contest experience and the retention of winner and loser effects.

Authors:  Michael M Kasumovic; Damian O Elias; Senthurran Sivalinghem; Andrew C Mason; Maydianne C B Andrade
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 2.671

Review 4.  Social eavesdropping and the evolution of conditional cooperation and cheating strategies.

Authors:  Ryan L Earley
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-12       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Eavesdropping in crabs: an agency for lady detection.

Authors:  Richard N C Milner; Michael D Jennions; Patricia R Y Backwell
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Heart rate modulation in bystanding geese watching social and non-social events.

Authors:  Claudia A F Wascher; Isabella B R Scheiber; Kurt Kotrschal
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Nuthatches eavesdrop on variations in heterospecific chickadee mobbing alarm calls.

Authors:  Christopher N Templeton; Erick Greene
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-03-19       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Concede or clash? Solitary sharks competing for food assess rivals to decide.

Authors:  Pierpaolo F Brena; Johann Mourier; Serge Planes; Eric E Clua
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Audience effects in the Atlantic molly (Poecilia mexicana)-prudent male mate choice in response to perceived sperm competition risk?

Authors:  Madlen Ziege; Kristin Mahlow; Carmen Hennige-Schulz; Claudia Kronmarck; Ralph Tiedemann; Bruno Streit; Martin Plath
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 3.172

10.  Balancing risks and rewards: the logic of violence.

Authors:  Mark Broom
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.