Literature DB >> 11375107

Male great tits eavesdrop on simulated male-to-male vocal interactions.

T M Peake1, A M Terry, P K McGregor, T Dabelsteen.   

Abstract

Animal communication generally occurs in the environment of a network of several potential signallers and receivers. Within a network environment, it is possible to gain relative information about conspecifics by eavesdropping on signalling interactions. We presented male great tits with the opportunity to gain such information by simulating singing interactions using two loudspeakers. Interactions were presented so that relevant information was not available in the absolute singing behaviour of either individual, only in the relative timing of their songs in the interaction as a whole. We then assayed the information extracted by focal males by subsequently introducing one of the 'interactants' (i.e. loudspeakers) into the territory of the focal male. Focal males responded with a reduced song output to males that had just 'lost' an interaction. Focal males did not respond significantly differently to 'winners' as compared with intruders recently involved in an interaction that contained no consistent information. Focal males also responded by switching song types more often when encountering males that had recently been involved in a low-intensity interaction. These results provide the clearest evidence yet that male songbirds extract information from signal interactions between conspecifics in the field.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11375107      PMCID: PMC1088725          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1648

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  23 in total

1.  Public information for the assessment of quality: a widespread social phenomenon.

Authors:  Thomas J Valone; Jennifer J Templeton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Information and aggression in fishes.

Authors:  Tom M Peake; Peter K McGregor
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Evolution of spite through indirect reciprocity.

Authors:  Rufus A Johnstone; Redouan Bshary
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Eavesdropping and signal matching in visual courtship displays of spiders.

Authors:  David L Clark; J Andrew Roberts; George W Uetz
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Overlapping signals in banded wrens: long-term effects of prior experience on males and females.

Authors:  Michelle L Hall; Anya Illes; Sandra L Vehrencamp
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.671

6.  Effects of personality on territory defence in communication networks: a playback experiment with radio-tagged great tits.

Authors:  Mathieu Amy; Philipp Sprau; Piet de Goede; Marc Naguib
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Cross-modal individual recognition in domestic horses (Equus caballus).

Authors:  Leanne Proops; Karen McComb; David Reby
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Song type matching is an honest early threat signal in a hierarchical animal communication system.

Authors:  Çağlar Akçay; Mari E Tom; S Elizabeth Campbell; Michael D Beecher
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Eavesdropping on cooperative communication within an ant-butterfly mutualism.

Authors:  Mark A Elgar; David R Nash; Naomi E Pierce
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2016-09-27

10.  Juvenile sparrows preferentially eavesdrop on adult song interactions.

Authors:  Christopher N Templeton; Caglar Akçay; S Elizabeth Campbell; Michael D Beecher
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.