Literature DB >> 12298307

Complications of invasive monitoring.

T Andrew Bowdle1.   

Abstract

Invasive monitoring in anesthesiology is relatively safe. Arterial catheterization in particular has an extremely low rate of serious complications. Radial, brachial, and femoral artery catheterization sites appear to have similar and low complication rates. CVP and PA catheters are more dangerous and entail potentially fatal complications. The most troublesome complication with CVP catheters is perforation of the heart or cava, which should be avoidable under most circumstances if care is taken to position the catheter properly, outside the heart. Chest radiography should be used to specifically ascertain that the catheter is not in a dangerous location. The most troublesome complication with PA catheters is perforation of the pulmonary artery. This is probably a sporadic problem, and it is not necessarily avoidable by adherence to particular techniques. It should be assumed that hemoptysis in a patient with a PA catheter is caused by perforation of the pulmonary artery until proven otherwise, and it should be treated aggressively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12298307     DOI: 10.1016/s0889-8537(02)00004-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiol Clin North Am        ISSN: 0889-8537


  16 in total

Review 1.  Cardiac output monitoring devices: an analytic review.

Authors:  Jahan Porhomayon; Ali El-Solh; Peter Papadakos; Nader Djalal Nader
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 3.397

2.  The changes of pulmonary blood flow in non-ventilated lung during one lung ventilation.

Authors:  Quan Gong; Zhanyun Yang; Wei Wei
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Transpulmonary Thermodilution Versus Transthoracic Echocardiography for Cardiac Output Measurements in Severely Burned Children.

Authors:  Paul Wurzer; Ludwik K Branski; Marc G Jeschke; Arham Ali; Michael P Kinsky; Fredrick J Bohanon; Gabriel Hundeshagen; William B Norbury; Felicia N Williams; Lars-P Kamolz; Celeste C Finnerty; David N Herndon
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.454

4.  Comparison of the accuracy of transpulmonary thermodilution measurement using indicators of different temperatures.

Authors:  Shulan Chen; Pingdong Lin; Zhenshuang Du; Fangchen Lan; Shanshan Wu; Tiegang Zhong; Xiaohua Liang; Hongyu Liu; Cuiping Zeng; Chenghua Zhang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-12-15

Review 5.  Laparoscopic surgery: pitfalls due to anesthesia, positioning, and pneumoperitoneum.

Authors:  C P Henny; J Hofland
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-07-28       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  A comparison of noninvasive blood pressure measurement on the wrist with invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring in patients undergoing bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Helmut Hager; Goutham Mandadi; Debra Pulley; J Chris Eagon; Edward Mascha; Benjamin Nutter; Andrea Kurz
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Variant thoracic venous drainage and its hazards with catheter for haemodialysis.

Authors:  W Herrington; Santhanakrishnan Balasubramanian; Marcus Nicholls; Colin H Jones
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2013-09-01

8.  Hemodynamic monitoring and management of patients undergoing high-risk surgery: a survey among Chinese anesthesiologists.

Authors:  Guo Chen; Yunxia Zuo; Lei Yang; Elena Chung; Maxime Cannesson
Journal:  J Biomed Res       Date:  2014-08-07

9.  Central venous catheter placement: An alternative of Certodyn(®) (Universal Adapter).

Authors:  Manish Jain; Bhavana Rastogi; V P Singh; Kumkum Gupta
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2011 Jul-Dec

10.  Non-invasive monitoring of blood pressure using the Philips Intellivue MP50 monitor cannot replace invasive blood pressure techniques in surgery patients under general anesthesia.

Authors:  Xianghu Meng; Guanghui Zang; Longchang Fan; Lei Zheng; Jinzhen Dai; Xueren Wang; Wei Xia; Jihong Liu; Chuanhan Zhang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 2.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.