Literature DB >> 12269296

Eye movements and scene perception: memory for things observed.

David E Irwin1, Gregory J Zelinsky.   

Abstract

In this study, we examined the characteristics of on-line scene representations, using a partial-report procedure. Subjects inspected a simple scene containing seven objects for 1, 3, 5, 9, or 15 fixations; shortly after scene offset, a marker cued one scene location for report. Consistent with previous research, the results indicated that scene representations are relatively sparse; even after 15 fixations on a scene, the subjects remembered the position/identity pairings for only about 78% of the objects in the scene, or the equivalent of about five objects-worth of information. Report of the last three objects that were foveated and of the object about to be foveated was very accurate, however, suggesting that recently attended information in a scene is represented quite well. Information about the scene appeared to accumulate over multiple fixations, but the capacity of the on-line scene representation appeared to be limited to about five items. Implications for recent theories of scene representation are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12269296     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196793

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  43 in total

1.  Selective attention during scene perception: evidence from negative priming.

Authors:  Robert D Gordon
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-10

2.  Memory for the search path: evidence for a high-capacity representation of search history.

Authors:  Christopher A Dickinson; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  The role of attention in the maintenance of feature bindings in visual short-term memory.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Johnson; Andrew Hollingworth; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Understanding the function of visual short-term memory: transsaccadic memory, object correspondence, and gaze correction.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth; Ashleigh M Richard; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2008-02

5.  Losing sight of the bigger picture: peripheral field loss compresses representations of space.

Authors:  Francesca C Fortenbaugh; John C Hicks; Lei Hao; Kathleen A Turano
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-08-10       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 6.  A theory of eye movements during target acquisition.

Authors:  Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Timing of saccadic eye movements during visual search for multiple targets.

Authors:  Chia-Chien Wu; Eileen Kowler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Spatial asymmetries in viewing and remembering scenes: consequences of an attentional bias?

Authors:  Christopher A Dickinson; Helene Intraub
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Attentive Tracking Disrupts Feature Binding in Visual Working Memory.

Authors:  Daryl Fougnie; René Marois
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2009-01-01

10.  The strategic retention of task-relevant objects in visual working memory.

Authors:  Ashleigh M Maxcey-Richard; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.