Literature DB >> 12244470

[CT radiation exposure in children: Consequences of the American discussion for Europe].

P Vock1.   

Abstract

QUESTION: Does radiation exposure in pediatric CT require a specific action?
METHODS: Review of the recent literature.
RESULTS: Increasing medical applications and numbers of examinations coupled with a significant individual radiation exposure have increased the CT contribution to medical exposure to around 38-60%. An up to 10-fold increase in radiation sensitivity of small children, their longer life expectancy and an overdose due to protocols copied from adult patients are the factors responsible for a small but significant excess of cancer mortality over lifetime. Strict referral and use of the many technical and medical ways of reducing exposure help reduce exposure.
CONCLUSION: Realizing the problem of pediatric CT-exposure is as important as analyzing and reducing the causes of biologic impact by CT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12244470     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-002-0812-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  7 in total

1.  Early alterations in cytokine expression in adult compared to developing lung in mice after radiation exposure.

Authors:  Carl J Johnston; Eric Hernady; Christina Reed; Sally W Thurston; Jacob N Finkelstein; Jacqueline P Williams
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 2.  CT dose reduction in children.

Authors:  Peter Vock
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Fears, feelings, and facts: interactively communicating benefits and risks of medical radiation with patients.

Authors:  Lawrence T Dauer; Raymond H Thornton; Jennifer L Hay; Rochelle Balter; Matthew J Williamson; Jean St Germain
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Improvement of image quality of multislice spiral CT scans of the head and neck region using a raw data-based multidimensional adaptive filtering (MAF) technique.

Authors:  Ulrich Baum; Katharina Anders; Gregor Steinbichler; Michael Lell; Holger Greess; Thomas Riedel; Marc Kachelriess; Willi A Kalender; Werner A Bautz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-08-24       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging for intensive care infants: safe and effective?

Authors:  Samir Sarikouch; Rainer Schaeffler; Hermann Körperich; Aristidis Dongas; Nikolaus A Haas; Philipp Beerbaum
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 1.655

6.  Dose reduction in subsecond multislice spiral CT examination of children by online tube current modulation.

Authors:  H Greess; J Lutze; A Nömayr; H Wolf; T Hothorn; W A Kalender; W Bautz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-03-30       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  How reliable are the risk estimates for X-ray examinations in forensic age estimations? A safety update.

Authors:  F Ramsthaler; P Proschek; W Betz; M A Verhoff
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 2.686

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.