Literature DB >> 12242733

Role of color and power doppler imaging in differentiating between malignant and benign solid breast masses.

Sheen-Woo Lee1, Hye Young Choi, Seung Yon Baek, Soo Mee Lim.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study analyzed the color and power Doppler signals in solid breast masses and assessed their value in differentiating malignant from benign lesions.
METHODS: One hundred twenty-nine biopsy-proven solid breast masses (54 malignant and 75 benign) were evaluated with color and/or power Doppler sonography using a 7-MHz linear-array transducer. We retrospectively analyzed the location, shape, and penetration of the Doppler vascular signals in the breast masses. The location of the vascular signals was categorized as central, peripheral, or both. The shape of the signals was categorized as linear, irregular, branching, or a single dot. A penetrating vessel was defined as a continuous vascular signal extending from outside the lesion to inside it. In 43 cases, power and color Doppler sonograms were compared.
RESULTS: Doppler features suggestive of malignant lesions were the presence of both peripheral and central vascularity (odds ratio, 6.0), presence of penetrating vessels (odds ratio, 5.4), and presence of branching vessels (odds ratio, 13.7). Power Doppler sonography was more sensitive than color Doppler sonography in detecting vascular signals in 49% of cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Color (power) Doppler imaging is a valuable adjunct to conventional sonography in differentiating between malignant and benign breast lesions. Copyright 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Ultrasound 30:459-464, 2002; Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/jcu.10100

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12242733     DOI: 10.1002/jcu.10100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound        ISSN: 0091-2751            Impact factor:   0.910


  17 in total

Review 1.  A review of breast ultrasound.

Authors:  Chandra M Sehgal; Susan P Weinstein; Peter H Arger; Emily F Conant
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.673

2.  Ultrasensitive Ultrasound Microvessel Imaging for Characterizing Benign and Malignant Breast Tumors.

Authors:  Ping Gong; Pengfei Song; Chengwu Huang; U-Wai Lok; Shanshan Tang; Yue Yu; Duane D Meixner; Kathryn J Ruddy; Karthik Ghosh; Robert T Fazzio; Wenwu Ling; Shigao Chen
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-09-14       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Evaluation of solid breast lesions with power Doppler: value of penetrating vessels as a predictor of malignancy.

Authors:  Rositaa Ibrahim; Kartini Rahmat; Farhana Fadzli; Faizatul Izza Rozalli; Caroline Judy Westerhout; Kasumawati Alli; Anushya Vijayananthan; Fatimah Moosa
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.858

4.  Characterizing Breast Lesions Using Quantitative Parametric 3D Subharmonic Imaging: A Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Anush Sridharan; John R Eisenbrey; Maria Stanczak; Priscilla Machado; Daniel A Merton; Annina Wilkes; Alexander Sevrukov; Haydee Ojeda-Fournier; Robert F Mattrey; Kirk Wallace; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  Ultrasound high-definition microvasculature imaging with novel quantitative biomarkers improves breast cancer detection accuracy.

Authors:  Redouane Ternifi; Yinong Wang; Juanjuan Gu; Eric C Polley; Jodi M Carter; Sandhya Pruthi; Judy C Boughey; Robert T Fazzio; Mostafa Fatemi; Azra Alizad
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 7.034

6.  Correlation between Blood Flow Signal of Color Flow Imaging and Nottingham Prognostic Index in Patients with Breast Carcinoma.

Authors:  Zhi-Yong Shen; Bing Hu; Ming-Feng Wu
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Can second-look ultrasound downgrade MRI-detected lesions? A retrospective study.

Authors:  Michael Kolta; Paola Clauser; Panagiotis Kapetas; Maria Bernathova; Katja Pinker; Thomas H Helbich; Pascal A T Baltzer
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2020-04-11       Impact factor: 3.528

8.  Breast imaging in the new era.

Authors:  K Planche; S Vinnicombe
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2004-01-12       Impact factor: 3.909

9.  The Diagnostic Value of Superb Microvascular Imaging (SMI) in Detecting Blood Flow Signals of Breast Lesions: A Preliminary Study Comparing SMI to Color Doppler Flow Imaging.

Authors:  Yan Ma; Gang Li; Jing Li; Wei-Dong Ren
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  An Innovative Ultrasound Technique for Evaluation of Tumor Vascularity in Breast Cancers: Superb Micro-Vascular Imaging.

Authors:  Ah Young Park; Bo Kyoung Seo; Sang Hoon Cha; Suk Keu Yeom; Seung Wha Lee; Hwan Hoon Chung
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 3.588

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.