Literature DB >> 32339982

Can second-look ultrasound downgrade MRI-detected lesions? A retrospective study.

Michael Kolta1, Paola Clauser1, Panagiotis Kapetas1, Maria Bernathova1, Katja Pinker2, Thomas H Helbich1, Pascal A T Baltzer3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether MRI-detected suspicious (BIRADS 4 & 5) breast lesions can be downgraded using second-look ultrasound (SLU) and thus reduce unnecessarily performed breast biopsies. MATERIALS
METHODS: A retrospective single-center review of consecutive patients, who underwent breast MRI studies during a 12-month time period was performed. 94 patients with 103 lesions undergoing SLU of incidentally detected MRI BI-RADS 4&5 lesions which were not identified on previous ultrasound were included in the study. The SLU detection rate and SLU features of the lesions were assessed. Histology (91/103) or two year follow up (n = 12) were defined as the reference standard for lesion diagnosis.
RESULTS: 57 (55.3 %) of the 103 lesions were identified on SLU. 17 of the identified lesions were malignant (29.8 %). Lesions detected on ultrasound presented on MRI as masses in 66.7 % (38/57) and non-mass in 33.3 % (19/57). Our findings showed that it is possible to distinguish between malignant and benign lesions with SLU. The results were significant (p < 0.05) for the following morphological features: shape, orientation, margins, architectural distortion, hyperechoic rim/ edema. All lesions classified as SLU BI-RADS 2 in our study were benign and thus, 30 % of all unnecessary biopsies could potentially have been avoided. Including SLU BI-RADS 3 lesions, this rate increased to 60 %, while yielding one (of 17, 5.8 %) false negative result. All three BI-RADS 5 lesions detected by SLU presented as malignant on ultrasound.
CONCLUSION: SLU can potentially downgrade incidental MRI BIRADS 4 lesions. This may reduce the number of unnecessarily performed biopsies by 30-60 %, thus simplifying patient management.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BI-RADS; Breast cancer; Image- guided biopsy; Magnetic resonance imaging; Second-look ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32339982      PMCID: PMC8223588          DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108976

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  26 in total

Review 1.  Utility of second-look ultrasound in the evaluation of MRI-detected breast lesions.

Authors:  Jessica W T Leung
Journal:  Semin Roentgenol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 0.800

2.  Contralateral enhancing lesions on magnetic resonance imaging in patients with breast cancer: role of second-look sonography and imaging findings of synchronous contralateral cancer.

Authors:  Tae Hee Kim; Doo Kyoung Kang; Yong Sik Jung; Ku Sang Kim; Hyunee Yim
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.153

3.  Can we predict lesion detection rates in second-look ultrasound of MRI-detected breast lesions? A systematic analysis.

Authors:  Alexander Bumberger; Paola Clauser; Michael Kolta; Panagiotis Kapetas; Maria Bernathova; Thomas H Helbich; Katja Pinker; Pascal A Baltzer
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 3.528

4.  Erratum to "Ultrasound features of retroareolar breast carcinoma" [Diagn. Interv. Imaging 98 (2017) 409-413].

Authors:  R Ferre; M Pare; B Mesurolle
Journal:  Diagn Interv Imaging       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 4.026

5.  The use of breast ultrasound color Doppler vascular pattern morphology improves diagnostic sensitivity with minimal change in specificity.

Authors:  W E Svensson; A J Pandian; H Hashimoto
Journal:  Ultraschall Med       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 6.548

6.  Indeterminate or suspicious breast lesions detected initially with MR imaging: value of MRI-directed breast ultrasound.

Authors:  Cholatip Wiratkapun; Deirdre Duke; Amy S Nordmann; Panuwat Lertsithichai; Vamsidhar Narra; Premsri T Barton; Charles F Hildebolt; Kyongtae T Bae
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 7.  Breast MRI: EUSOBI recommendations for women's information.

Authors:  Ritse M Mann; Corinne Balleyguier; Pascal A Baltzer; Ulrich Bick; Catherine Colin; Eleanor Cornford; Andrew Evans; Eva Fallenberg; Gabor Forrai; Michael H Fuchsjäger; Fiona J Gilbert; Thomas H Helbich; Sylvia H Heywang-Köbrunner; Julia Camps-Herrero; Christiane K Kuhl; Laura Martincich; Federica Pediconi; Pietro Panizza; Luis J Pina; Ruud M Pijnappel; Katja Pinker-Domenig; Per Skaane; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  A simple classification system (the Tree flowchart) for breast MRI can reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies in MRI-only lesions.

Authors:  Ramona Woitek; Claudio Spick; Melanie Schernthaner; Margaretha Rudas; Panagiotis Kapetas; Maria Bernathova; Julia Furtner; Katja Pinker; Thomas H Helbich; Pascal A T Baltzer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  A survey by the European Society of Breast Imaging on the utilisation of breast MRI in clinical practice.

Authors:  Paola Clauser; Ritse Mann; Alexandra Athanasiou; Helmut Prosch; Katja Pinker; Matthias Dietzel; Thomas H Helbich; Michael Fuchsjäger; Julia Camps-Herrero; Francesco Sardanelli; Gabor Forrai; Pascal A T Baltzer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Breast MRI: guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging.

Authors:  R M Mann; C K Kuhl; K Kinkel; C Boetes
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  1 in total

1.  Assessment of MRI-Detected Breast Lesions: A Benign Correlate on Second-Look Ultrasound Can Safely Exclude Malignancy.

Authors:  Karin Hellerhoff; Hanna Dietrich; Regina Schinner; Dorothea Rjosk-Dendorfer; Anikó Sztrókay-Gaul; Maximilian Reiser; Susanne Grandl
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 2.268

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.