Literature DB >> 11270524

Duplex criteria for determination of 50% or greater carotid stenosis.

D G Neschis1, F J Lexa, J T Davis, J P Carpenter.   

Abstract

Recently the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial investigators reported a benefit of carotid endarterectomy compared with medical therapy for symptomatic patients with 50% or greater carotid stenosis. This has necessitated the development of screening parameters for diagnosis of 50% or greater carotid stenosis on the basis of the reference standards used in the study by the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. The duplex scans and arteriograms of 110 patients (210 carotid arteries) were reviewed by blinded readers. Duplex measurements of peak systolic velocity and end diastolic velocity were recorded, and the ratio of these velocities in the internal and common carotid arteries was calculated. The criteria determined for detection of 50% or greater stenosis were as follows: peak systolic velocity of the internal carotid artery greater than 170 cm/s (sensitivity, 92%; specificity, 90%; positive predictive value, 92%; negative predictive value, 90%; and accuracy, 91 %); end diastolic velocity of the internal carotid artery greater than 60 cm/s (sensitivity, 92%; specificity, 86%; positive predictive value, 95%; negative predictive value, 79%; and accuracy, 91 %); ratio of peak systolic velocity of the internal carotid artery to peak systolic velocity of the common carotid artery greater than 2 (sensitivity, 93%; specificity, 75%; positive predictive value, 83%; negative predictive value, 89%; and accuracy, 85%); and ratio of end diastolic velocity of the internal carotid artery to end diastolic velocity of the common carotid artery greater than 2.4 (sensitivity, 96%; specificity, 79%; positive predictive value, 88%; negative predictive value, 92%; and accuracy, 89%). It is concluded that 50% or greater carotid artery stenosis can be reliably determined by duplex criteria. The use of receiver operating characteristic curves allows the individualization of duplex criteria to the clinical situation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11270524     DOI: 10.7863/jum.2001.20.3.207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  5 in total

1.  Carotid endarterectomy should not be based on consensus statement duplex velocity criteria.

Authors:  Jesse A Columbo; Bjoern D Suckow; Claire L Griffin; Jack L Cronenwett; Philip P Goodney; Timothy G Lukovits; Robert M Zwolak; Mark F Fillinger
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 4.268

2.  Multi-parametric ultrasound criteria for internal carotid artery disease-comparison with CT angiography.

Authors:  Kristian Barlinn; Thomas Floegel; Hagen H Kitzler; Jessica Kepplinger; Timo Siepmann; Lars-Peder Pallesen; Ulf Bodechtel; Heinz Reichmann; Andrei V Alexandrov; Volker Puetz
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 3.  Duplex ultrasound for diagnosing symptomatic carotid stenosis in the extracranial segments.

Authors:  Nicolle Cassola; Jose Cc Baptista-Silva; Luis Cu Nakano; Carolina Dq Flumignan; Ricardo Sesso; Vladimir Vasconcelos; Nelson Carvas Junior; Ronald Lg Flumignan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-07-11

4.  Carotid artery stenting in the first 100 consecutive patients: results and follow up.

Authors:  G Stankovic; F Liistro; S Moshiri; C Briguori; N Corvaja; G Gimelli; A Chieffo; M Montorfano; L Finci; V Spanos; C Di Mario; A Colombo
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Effects of carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting on high-risk carotid stenosis patients.

Authors:  Peifu Wang; Chunyang Liang; Jichen Du; Jilai Li
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.088

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.