OBJECTIVE: To study the role of echocardiography in the stepwise evaluation of syncope. DESIGN: A prospective observational study with an 18 month follow up. SETTING: University teaching hospital providing primary and tertiary care. SUBJECTS: 650 consecutive patients with syncope and clinical suspicion of an obstructive valvar lesion, or with syncope not explained by history, physical examination, or a 12 lead ECG, who underwent bidimensional Doppler transthoracic echocardiography. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The causes of syncope were assigned using published diagnostic criteria. Echocardiography was considered diagnostic when confirming a suspected diagnosis, or when revealing occult cardiac disease explaining the syncope. RESULTS: A systolic murmur was identified in 61 of the 650 patients (9%). Severe aortic stenosis was suspected in 20 of these and was confirmed by echocardiography in eight. Follow up excluded further cases of aortic stenosis. In patients with unexplained syncope (n = 155), routine echocardiography showed no abnormalities that established the cause of the syncope. Echocardiography was normal or non-relevant in all patients with a negative cardiac history and a normal ECG (n = 67). In patients with a positive cardiac history or an abnormal ECG (n = 88), echocardiography showed systolic dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 40%) in 24 (27%) and minor non-relevant findings in the remaining 64. Arrhythmias were diagnosed in 12 of the 24 patients with systolic dysfunction (50%), and in 12 of the 64 remaining patients (19%) (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Echocardiography was most useful for assessing the severity of the underlying cardiac disease and for risk stratification in patients with unexplained syncope but with a positive cardiac history or an abnormal ECG.
OBJECTIVE: To study the role of echocardiography in the stepwise evaluation of syncope. DESIGN: A prospective observational study with an 18 month follow up. SETTING: University teaching hospital providing primary and tertiary care. SUBJECTS: 650 consecutive patients with syncope and clinical suspicion of an obstructive valvar lesion, or with syncope not explained by history, physical examination, or a 12 lead ECG, who underwent bidimensional Doppler transthoracic echocardiography. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The causes of syncope were assigned using published diagnostic criteria. Echocardiography was considered diagnostic when confirming a suspected diagnosis, or when revealing occult cardiac disease explaining the syncope. RESULTS: A systolic murmur was identified in 61 of the 650 patients (9%). Severe aortic stenosis was suspected in 20 of these and was confirmed by echocardiography in eight. Follow up excluded further cases of aortic stenosis. In patients with unexplained syncope (n = 155), routine echocardiography showed no abnormalities that established the cause of the syncope. Echocardiography was normal or non-relevant in all patients with a negative cardiac history and a normal ECG (n = 67). In patients with a positive cardiac history or an abnormal ECG (n = 88), echocardiography showed systolic dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 40%) in 24 (27%) and minor non-relevant findings in the remaining 64. Arrhythmias were diagnosed in 12 of the 24 patients with systolic dysfunction (50%), and in 12 of the 64 remaining patients (19%) (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Echocardiography was most useful for assessing the severity of the underlying cardiac disease and for risk stratification in patients with unexplained syncope but with a positive cardiac history or an abnormal ECG.
Authors: M Brignole; P Alboni; D Benditt; L Bergfeldt; J J Blanc; P E Bloch Thomsen; J G van Dijk; A Fitzpatrick; S Hohnloser; J Janousek; W Kapoor; R A Kenny; P Kulakowski; A Moya; A Raviele; R Sutton; G Theodorakis; W Wieling Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: F P Sarasin; M Louis-Simonet; D Carballo; S Slama; A Rajeswaran; J T Metzger; C Lovis; P F Unger; A F Junod Journal: Am J Med Date: 2001-08-15 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: R B Krol; F Morady; G C Flaker; L A DiCarlo; J M Baerman; J Hewett; M de Buitleir Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1987-08 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Mathilde Musoni Falsing; Phillip Brainin; Ditte Madsen Andersen; Charlotte Ellen Larroudé; Tommi Bo Lindhart; Daniel Modin; Kirstine Ravnkilde; Emil Høegholm Karsum; Gunnar Gislason; Tor Biering-Sørensen Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2021-05-28 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Marc A Probst; Thomas A Gibson; Robert E Weiss; Annick N Yagapen; Susan E Malveau; David H Adler; Aveh Bastani; Christopher W Baugh; Jeffrey M Caterino; Carol L Clark; Deborah B Diercks; Judd E Hollander; Bret A Nicks; Daniel K Nishijima; Manish N Shah; Kirk A Stiffler; Alan B Storrow; Scott T Wilber; Benjamin C Sun Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2018-09-26 Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: Nathalie van der Velde; Bruno H Ch Stricker; Jos R T C Roelandt; Folkert J Ten Cate; Tischa J M van der Cammen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2007-07-25 Impact factor: 3.240